ArticleHeliyon2024
Integrated analysis of necroptosis related gene signature to predict clinical outcomes, immune status and drug sensitivity in lower grade Glioma.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The treatment of lower grade gliomas (LGG) is currently the most challenging dilemma in the management of intracranial tumors. Necroptosis is a type of programmed cell death that is closely associated with tumor progression, However, the role of necroptosis related genes in LGG is not yet well elucidated. Methods: Online databases were used to obtain gene expression and clinical information. After gene differential expression analysis, a risk score model based on prognostic differentially expressed necroptosis-related genes (DENGs) were constructed to predict prognosis for LGG patients. The validity of the risk score model was then assessed with Kaplan-Meier survival curve. The prognostic DENGs included in the risk score model were then subjected to gene expression analysis, functional enrichment analysis, consensus clustering analysis, and single cell sequencing analysis. Finally, we investigated the correlation of the risk score and immune infiltration in LGG tumor microenvironment and drug sensitivity for LGG patients in different risk groups. Results: A survival risk score model was constructed based on seven prognostic DENGs, which demonstrated satisfactory performance in predicting the prognosis of LGG patients. According to functional enrichment analyses, these seven DENGs may play a regulatory role in LGG tumorigenesis through several immune and metabolic pathways. LGG patients could be categorized into two clusters with distinct prognosis and clinicopathologic characteristics based on the expression of seven DENGs. Single-cell sequencing analysis demonstrated that the DENG signature was differentially expressed in various types of cells in LGG and may play a vital role in oncogenesis. Additionally, drug sensitivity analysis suggested that the seven-gene signature could guide clinical medication for LGG patients. Conclusion: Our study developed a reliable necroptosis-related signature to predict the prognosis of LGG patients. This gene signature may also help estimate immune status and anti-cancer drug sensitivity in LGG patients. Our findings may pave the way to enhance our understanding of necroptosis in LGG.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.