ReviewJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2024
Progress in the Application of Lung Ultrasound for the Evaluation of Neonates with Respiratory Distress Syndrome.
Review in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnostic performance of lung ultrasound and procalcitonin in differentiating early neonatal pneumonia from transient tachypnea of the newborn.BMC pediatrics · 2026Observational
- Base excess serves as a mediator in the hemoglobin-intensive care unit stay length relationship in neonatal respiratory distress syndrome.Translational pediatrics · 2025Article
- Lung Ultrasound in Pediatrics: A Review with Core Principles That Every User Should Know.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Rib suppression-based radiomics for diagnosis of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome in chest X-rays.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Lung ultrasound score ≥ 6 predicts surfactant administration decisions in meconium aspiration syndrome: a multicenter prospective study.Jornal de pediatriaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (NRDS) is a common critical disease in neonates. Early diagnosis and timely treatment are crucial. Historically, X-ray imaging was the primary method for diagnosing NRDS. However, this method carries radiation exposure risks, making it unsuitable for dynamic lung condition monitoring. In addition, neonates who are critically ill require bedside imaging, but diagnostic delays are often unavoidable due to equipment transportation and positioning limitations. These challenges have been resolved with the introduction of lung ultrasound (LUS) in neonatal intensive care. The diagnostic efficacy and specificity of LUS for NRDS is superior to that of X-ray. The non-invasive, dynamic, and real-time benefits of LUS also allow for real-time monitoring of lung changes throughout treatment for NRDS, yielding important insights for guiding therapy. In this paper, we examine the ultrasonographic characteristics of NRDS and the recent progress in the application of ultrasound in the diagnosis and treatment of NRDS while aiming to promote wider adoption of this method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.