ArticleHealth science reports2024
CARDPSoML: Comparative approach to analyze and predict cardiovascular disease based on medical report data and feature fusion approach.
Article in Health science reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating Binary Classifiers for Cardiovascular Disease Prediction: Enhancing Early Diagnostic Capabilities.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2024Review
- CARDPSoML: Comparative approach to analyze and predict cardiovascular disease based on medical report data and feature fusion approach.Health science reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Diabetes patients are at high risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD), which makes early identification and prompt management essential. To diagnose CVD in diabetic patients, this work attempts to provide a feature-fusion strategy employing supervised learning classifiers. Methods: Preprocessing patient data is part of the method, and it includes important characteristics connected to diabetes including insulin resistance and blood glucose levels. Principal component analysis and wavelet transformations are two examples of feature extraction techniques that are used to extract pertinent characteristics. The supervised learning classifiers, such as neural networks, decision trees, and support vector machines, are then trained and assessed using these characteristics. Results: Based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy, these classifiers' performance is closely evaluated. The assessment findings show that the classifiers have a good accuracy and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve value, suggesting that the suggested strategy may be useful in diagnosing CVD in patients with diabetes. Conclusion: The recommended method shows potential as a useful tool for developing clinical decision support systems and for the early detection of CVD in diabetes patients. To further improve diagnostic skills, future research projects may examine the use of bigger and more varied datasets as well as different machine learning approaches. Using an organized strategy is a crucial first step in tackling the serious problem of CVD in people with diabetes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.