Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38192729›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in health services2023

Using normalization process theory to inform practice: evaluation of a virtual autism training for clinicians.

Belinda O'Hagan, Marilyn Augustyn, Rachel Amgott, Julie White, Ilana Hardesty, Candice Bangham, Amy Ursitti, Sarah Foster, Alana Chandler, Jacey Greece

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in health services, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Belinda O'HaganDivision of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States.
Marilyn AugustynDivision of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States.
Rachel AmgottDivision of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States.
Julie WhiteCenter for Continuing Education, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States.
Ilana HardestyCenter for Continuing Education, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States.
Candice BanghamDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States.
Amy UrsittiDivision of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States.
Sarah FosterDivision of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States.
Alana ChandlerDivision of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States.
Jacey GreeceDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: There is growing demand for developmental and behavioral pediatric services including autism evaluation and care management. Clinician trainings have been found to result in an increase of knowledge and attitudes. This study utilizes Normalization Process theory (NPT) to evaluate a clinician training program and its effects on practice. Methods: The year-long virtual training program about autism screening and care management included didactic portions and case presentations. Focus groups and interviews were conducted with primary care clinicians ( Results: Participants were motivated by the benefits of expanding and improving support for autistic patients but noted this effort requires effective collaboration within a complex network of care providers including clinicians, insurance agencies, and therapy providers. Although there were support that participants could provide to families there were still barriers including availability of behavior therapy and insufficient staffing. Overall, participants positively viewed the training and reported implementing new strategies into practice. Conclusion: Despite the small sample size, application of NPT allowed for assessment of both training delivery and implementation of strategies, and identification of recommendations for future training and practice sustainability. Follow-up focus groups explored participants' practice five months post-program. Variations in participants' baseline experience and context at follow-up to enable application of skills should be considered when using NPT to evaluate clinician trainings.

Indexed as

autismextension for community healthcare outcomesimplementation researchnormalization process theoryqualitative evaluation

Identifiers

PMID38192729
PMCPMC10773704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.