Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38192616›Full record

ReviewImmuno-oncology technology2023

Basics of advanced therapy medicinal product development in academic pharma and the role of a GMP simulation unit.

I Johanna, A Daudeij, F Devina, C Nijenhuis, B Nuijen, B Romberg, C de Haar, J Haanen, H Dolstra, E Bremer and 4 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Immuno-oncology technology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Landscape ofMolecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

I JohannaDepartment of Hematology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht.
A DaudeijCenter for Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht.
F DevinaCenter for Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht.
C NijenhuisDepartment of Pharmacy & Pharmacology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam.
B NuijenDepartment of Pharmacy & Pharmacology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam.
B RombergDepartment of Pharmacy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht.
C de HaarDepartment of Pharmacy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht.
J HaanenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam.
H DolstraLaboratory of Hematology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen.
E BremerDepartment of Hematology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Z SebestyenCenter for Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht.
T StraetemansDepartment of Hematology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht.
I JedemaDivision of Molecular Oncology and Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam.
J KuballDepartment of Hematology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following successes of authorized chimeric antigen receptor T-cell products being commercially marketed in the United States and European Union, product development of T-cell-based cancer immunotherapy consisting of cell-based advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs) has gained further momentum. Due to their complex characteristics, pharmacological properties of living cell products are, in contrast to classical biological drugs such as small molecules, more difficult to define. Despite the availability of many new advanced technologies that facilitate ATMP manufacturing, translation from research-grade to clinical-grade manufacturing in accordance with Good Manufacturing Practices (cGMP) needs a thorough product development process in order to maintain the same product characteristics and activity of the therapeutic product after full-scale clinical GMP production as originally developed within a research setting. The same holds true for transferring a fully developed GMP-grade production process between different GMP facilities. Such product development from the research to GMP-grade manufacturing and technology transfer processes of established GMP-compliant procedures between facilities are challenging. In this review, we highlight some of the main obstacles related to the product development, manufacturing process, and product analysis, as well as how these hinder rapid access to ATMPs. We elaborate on the role of academia, also referred to as 'academic pharma', and the added value of GMP production and GMP simulation facilities to keep innovation moving by reducing the development time and to keep final production costs reasonable.

Indexed as

ATMPcellular therapyclinical translationGMPprocess development

Identifiers

PMID38192616
PMCPMC10772236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.