ArticleHardwareX2024
Affordable lab-scale electrospinning setup with interchangeable collectors for targeted fiber formation.
Article in HardwareX, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Article
- A cost-effective and open-source near-field electrospinning system with a graphical user interface.HardwareX · 2025Article
- Development of a low-cost electrospinning system with a bidirectional collector for uniform nanofibrous membranes.HardwareX · 2025Article
- Fabrication of Biaxially Aligned Nanofibers via Insulating Block-Assisted Electrospinning and Their Applications.Macromolecular rapid communications · 2025Review
- Chemoresistive Gas Sensors Based on Electrospun 1D Nanostructures: Synergizing Morphology and Performance Optimization.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The electrospinning method is increasingly in demand due to its capability to produce fibers in the nanometer to micrometer range, with applications in diverse fields including biomedical, filtration, energy storage, and sensing. Many of these applications demand control over fiber layout and diameter. However, a standard flat plate collector yields random fibers with limited control over diameter and density. Other viable solutions offering a higher level of control are either scarce or substantially expensive, impeding the accessibility of this vital technique. This study addresses the challenge by designing an affordable laboratory-scale electrospinning setup with interchangeable collectors, enabling the creation of targeted fibers from random, aligned, and coiled. The collectors include the standard flat plate and two additional designs, which are a rotating drum and a spinneret tip collector. The rotating drum collector has adjustable speed control to collect aligned fibers and exhibits stability even at high rotational speeds. The spinneret tip collector was designed to produce helically coiled fibers. The setup was validated by directed fiber formation using polycaprolactone (PCL), a biodegradable and FDA-approved polymer. Overall, the uniqueness of the design lies in its affordability, modifiability, and replicability using readily available materials, thus extending the reach of the electrospinning technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.