Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38192569›Full record

ArticleAoB PLANTS2024

Bianca Bonato, Qiuran Wang, Silvia Guerra, Valentina Simonetti, Maria Bulgheroni, Silvia Quaggiotti, Benedetto Ruperti, Umberto Castiello

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AoB PLANTS, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Motor cognition in plants: from thought to real experiments.Theoretical and experimental plant physiology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Bianca BonatoDepartment of General Psychology, University of Padua, Via Venezia 8, 35131, Padua, Italy.
Qiuran WangDepartment of General Psychology, University of Padua, Via Venezia 8, 35131, Padua, Italy.
Silvia GuerraDepartment of General Psychology, University of Padua, Via Venezia 8, 35131, Padua, Italy.
Valentina SimonettiDepartment of General Psychology, University of Padua, Via Venezia 8, 35131, Padua, Italy.
Maria BulgheroniAb.Acus s.r.l, Via Francesco Caracciolo 77, 20155, Milan, Italy.
Silvia QuaggiottiDepartment of Agronomy, Animals, Food, Natural Resources and Environment, University of Padua, Viale dell'Università 16, 35020, Legnaro, Italy.
Benedetto RupertiDepartment of Agronomy, Animals, Food, Natural Resources and Environment, University of Padua, Viale dell'Università 16, 35020, Legnaro, Italy.
Umberto CastielloDepartment of General Psychology, University of Padua, Via Venezia 8, 35131, Padua, Italy.

Funding

European Research Council 101096728
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In life, it is common for almost every kind of organism to interact with one another. In the human realm, such interactions are at the basis of joint actions, when two or more agents syntonize their actions to achieve a common goal. Shared intentionality is the theoretical construct referring to the suite of abilities that enable such coordinated and collaborative interactions. While shared intentionality has become an important concept in research on social cognition, there is controversy surrounding its evolutionary origins. An aspect still unexplored but promising to bring new insights into this open debate is the study of

Indexed as

Cooperationintertwiningjoint actionkinematicspea plantsplant behaviorplant cognitionsocial cognition

Identifiers

PMID38192569
PMCPMC10773780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.