Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38192548›Full record

Observational studyFrontiers in public health2023

Etiquette of the antibiotic decision-making process for surgical prophylaxis in Ethiopia: a triangulated ethnographic study.

Getachew Alemkere, Gobezie T Tegegne, Getnet Abebe Molla, Alemu Belayneh, Hanan Muzeyin, Wendwosen Shewarega, Yidnekachew Degefaw, Addisu Melkie, Workineh Getahun, Hailu Tadeg and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Frontiers in public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Getachew AlemkereDepartment of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Gobezie T TegegneDepartment of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Getnet Abebe MollaDepartment of Surgery, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Alemu BelaynehDepartment of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Hanan MuzeyinDepartment of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Wendwosen ShewaregaAntimicrobial Resistance Prevention and Control Case Team, Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Lead Executive Office, Ministry of Health, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Yidnekachew DegefawAntimicrobial Resistance Prevention and Control Case Team, Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Lead Executive Office, Ministry of Health, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Addisu MelkieDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Workineh GetahunUSAID Medicines, Technologies, and Pharmaceutical Services Program, Management Sciences for Health, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Hailu TadegUSAID Medicines, Technologies, and Pharmaceutical Services Program, Management Sciences for Health, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Abebe AlemayehuDepartment of Surgery, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Eshetu GirmaDepartment of Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Wondwossen AmogneDepartment of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Addis Ababa University · ETManagement Sciences for Health · USGovernment of Ethiopia · ET

Funding

Health Professionals Education Partnership Initiative EthiopiaR25TW011214 · FIC · ADDIS ABABA UNIVERSITY · PI DERBEW, MILIARD · 2018 to 2022
$3.3M
FIC NIH HHS R25 TW011214
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Prophylactic antibiotics reduce surgery-associated infections and healthcare costs. While quantitative methods have been widely used to evaluate antibiotic use practices in surgical wards, they fall short of fully capturing the intricacies of antibiotic decision-making in these settings. Qualitative methods can bridge this gap by delving into the often-overlooked healthcare customs that shape antibiotic prescribing practices. Aim: This study aimed to explore the etiquette of the antibiotic decision-making process of surgical prophylaxis antibiotic use at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital (TASH). Methods: The observational study was carried out at TASH, a teaching and referral hospital in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, from 26 August 2021 to 1 January 2022. Overall, 21 business ward rounds, 30 medical record reviews, and 11 face-to-face interviews were performed sequentially to triangulate and cross-validate the qualitative observation. The data were collected until saturation. The data were cleaned, coded, summarized, and analyzed using the thematic analysis approach. Result: Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP) discussions were infrequent during surgical ward rounds in TASH, leading to practices that deviated from established recommendations. Clear documentation differentiating SAP from other antibiotic uses was also lacking, which contributed to unjustified extended SAP use in the postoperative period. Missed SAP documentation was common for emergency surgeries, as well as initial dose timing and pre-operative metronidazole administration. Importantly, there was no standardized facility guideline or clinical protocol for SAP use. Furthermore, SAP prescriptions were often signed by junior residents and medical interns, and administration was typically handled by anesthesiologists/anesthetists at the operating theater and by nurses in the wards. This suggests a delegation of SAP decision-making from surgeons to senior residents, then to junior residents, and finally to medical interns. Moreover, there was no adequate representation from pharmacy, nursing, and other staff during ward rounds. Conclusion: Deeply ingrained customs hinder evidence-based SAP decisions, leading to suboptimal practices and increased surgical site infection risks. Engaging SAP care services and implementing antimicrobial stewardship practices could optimize SAP usage and mitigate SSI risks.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial StewardshipCultureEthiopiaHospitalsHumansAnti-Bacterial Agentscustomdecision-makingEthiopiaqualitativesurgical antibiotic prophylaxissurgical site infections

Identifiers

PMID38192548
PMCPMC10773818
OpenAlexW4389924094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.