Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38192484›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2023

ELM-KL-LSTM: a robust and general incremental learning method for efficient classification of time series data.

Qiao Zhou, Zhong-Yi Wang, Lan Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Qiao ZhouCollege of Information and Electrical Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Zhong-Yi WangCollege of Information and Electrical Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Lan HuangCollege of Information and Electrical Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Efficiently analyzing and classifying dynamically changing time series data remains a challenge. The main issue lies in the significant differences in feature distribution that occur between old and new datasets generated constantly due to varying degrees of concept drift, anomalous data, erroneous data, high noise, and other factors. Taking into account the need to balance accuracy and efficiency when the distribution of the dataset changes, we proposed a new robust, generalized incremental learning (IL) model ELM-KL-LSTM. Extreme learning machine (ELM) is used as a lightweight pre-processing model which is updated using the new designed evaluation metrics based on Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence values to measure the difference in feature distribution within sliding windows. Finally, we implemented efficient processing and classification analysis of dynamically changing time series data based on ELM lightweight pre-processing model, model update strategy and long short-term memory networks (LSTM) classification model. We conducted extensive experiments and comparation analysis based on the proposed method and benchmark methods in several different real application scenarios. Experimental results show that, compared with the benchmark methods, the proposed method exhibits good robustness and generalization in a number of different real-world application scenarios, and can successfully perform model updates and efficient classification analysis of incremental data with varying degrees improvement of classification accuracy. This provides and extends a new means for efficient analysis of dynamically changing time-series data.

Indexed as

Concept driftDynamically changing time series dataEfficient classification analyzingLightweight preprocessing modelModel update strategy

Identifiers

PMID38192484
PMCPMC10773756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.