Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38192473›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2023

Object detection in optical imaging of the Internet of Things based on deep learning.

Rui Chen, Lei Hei, Yi Lai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rui ChenSchool of Communications and Information Engineering, Xi'an University of Posts and Telecommunications, Xi'an, Shanxi, China.
Lei HeiThe Institute of Xi'an Aerospace Solid Propulsion Technology, Xi'an, China.
Yi LaiSchool of Communications and Information Engineering, Xi'an University of Posts and Telecommunications, Xi'an, Shanxi, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article endeavors to enhance image recognition technology within the context of the Internet of Things (IoT). A dynamic image target detection training model is established through the convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithm within the framework of deep learning (DL). Three distinct model configurations are proposed: a nine-layer convolution model, a seven-layer convolution model, and a residual module convolution model. Subsequently, the simulation model of CNN image target detection based on optical imaging is constructed, and the simulation experiments are conducted in scenarios of simple and salient environments, complex and salient environments, and intricate micro-environment. By determining the optimal training iterations, comparisons are drawn in terms of precision, accuracy, Intersection Over Union (IoU), and frames per second (FPS) among different model configurations. Finally, an attention mechanism is incorporated within the DL framework, leading to the construction of an attention mechanism CNN target detection model that operates at three difficulty levels: simple, intermediate, and challenging. Through comparative analysis against prevalent target detection algorithms, this article delves into the accuracy and detection efficiency of various models for IoT target detection. Key findings include: (1) The seven-layer CNN model exhibits commendable accuracy and confidence in simple and salient environments, although it encounters certain instances of undetected images, indicating scope for improvement. (2) The residual network model, when employing a loss function comprising both mean square error (MSE) and cross entropy, demonstrates superior performance in complex and salient environments, manifesting high precision, IoU, and accuracy metrics, thereby establishing itself as a robust detection model. (3) Within intricate micro-environments, the residual CNN model, utilizing loss functions of MSE and cross entropy, yields substantial results, with precision, IoU, and FPS values amounting to 0.99, 0.83, and 29.9, respectively. (4) The CNN model enriched with an attention mechanism outperforms other models in IoT target image detection, achieving the highest accuracy rates of 24.86%, 17.8%, and 14.77% in the simple, intermediate, and challenging levels, respectively. Although this model entails slightly longer detection times, its overall detection performance is excellent, augmenting the effectiveness of object detection within IoT. This article strives to enhance image target detection accuracy and speed, bolster the recognition capability of IoT systems, and refine dynamic image target detection within IoT settings. The implications encompass reduced manual recognition costs and the provision of a theoretical foundation for optimizing imaging and image target detection technologies in the IoT context.

Indexed as

Convolutional neural networkDeep learningImage target detectionOptical imagingVisualization

Identifiers

PMID38192473
PMCPMC10773733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.