ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2023
Binary semantic segmentation for detection of prostate adenocarcinoma using an ensemble with attention and residual U-Net architectures.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- DGCFNet: Dual Global Context Fusion Network for remote sensing image semantic segmentation.PeerJ. Computer science · 2025Article
- Article
- Artificial Intelligence Algorithms and Their Current Role in the Identification and Comparison of Gleason Patterns in Prostate Cancer Histopathology: A Comprehensive Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An accurate determination of the Gleason Score (GS) or Gleason Pattern (GP) is crucial in the diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa) because it is one of the criterion used to guide treatment decisions for prognostic-risk groups. However, the manually designation of GP by a pathologist using a microscope is prone to error and subject to significant inter-observer variability. Deep learning has been used to automatically differentiate GP on digitized slides, aiding pathologists and reducing inter-observer variability, especially in the early GP of cancer. This article presents a binary semantic segmentation for the GP of prostate adenocarcinoma. The segmentation separates benign and malignant tissues, with the malignant class consisting of adenocarcinoma GP3 and GP4 tissues annotated from 50 unique digitized whole slide images (WSIs) of prostate needle core biopsy specimens stained with hematoxylin and eosin. The pyramidal digitized WSIs were extracted into image patches with a size of 256 × 256 pixels at a magnification of 20×. An ensemble approach is proposed combining U-Net-based architectures, including traditional U-Net, attention-based U-Net, and residual attention-based U-Net. This work initially considers a PCa tissue analysis using a combination of attention gate units with residual convolution units. The performance evaluation revealed a mean Intersection-over-Union of 0.79 for the two classes, 0.88 for the benign class, and 0.70 for the malignant class. The proposed method was then used to produce pixel-level segmentation maps of PCa adenocarcinoma tissue slides in the testing set. We developed a screening tool to discriminate between benign and malignant prostate tissue in digitized images of needle biopsy samples using an AI approach. We aimed to identify malignant adenocarcinoma tissues from our own collected, annotated, and organized dataset. Our approach returned the performance which was accepted by the pathologists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.