ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2023
Bitcoin volatility in bull
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cryptocurrencies have emerged as a popular investment vehicle, prompting numerous efforts to predict market trends and identify metrics that signal periods of volatility. One promising approach involves leveraging on-chain data, which is unique to cryptocurrencies. On-chain data, extracted directly from the blockchain, provides valuable information, such as the hash rate, total transactions, or the total number of addresses that hold a specified amount of cryptocurrency. Some studies have also explored the relationship between social media sentiment and Bitcoin, using data from platforms such as Twitter and Google Trends. However, the quality of Twitter sentiment analysis has been lackluster due to suboptimal extraction techniques. This research proposes a novel approach that combines a superior sentiment analysis technique with various on-chain metrics to improve predictions using a deep learning architecture based on long-short term memory (LSTM). The proposed model predicts outcomes for multiple time horizons, ranging from one day to 14 days, and outperforms the Martingale (random walk) approach by over 9%, as measured by the mean absolute percentage error metric, as well as recent results reported in literature. To the best of our knowledge, this study may be among the first to employ this combination of techniques to improve cryptocurrency market prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.