ArticleBiophysical reviews2023
Computational biophysics of atomic force microscopy-an IUPAB-sponsored workshop.
Article in Biophysical reviews, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Practical measures for achieving greater alignment between scientific practice and meaningful research output.Biophysical reviews · 2025Article
- Biophysical Reviews: peering into 2024.Biophysical reviews · 2024Article
- Article
- Computational biophysics of atomic force microscopy-an IUPAB-sponsored workshop.Biophysical reviews · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) is a structural determination technique that involves 'prodding' surfaces with a nanometer sized needle with concomitant measurement of the resisting force. Due to its ability to interrogate the nanometer-to-micrometer size range, AFM is especially suited to the structural analysis of everything from biopolymers to cells and, as such, has become an important biophysical method. As AFM was only invented in 1986 it is relatively less scientifically developed than other structural techniques, such as NMR, X-ray crystallography and electron microscopy, that have a longer history of usage. In September of 2022 the first workshop of its kind was held to examine modern computational methods useful for simulating and analysing bioAFM experiments. Sponsored by a small IUPAB workshop grant, the three day meeting was of the hybrid (joint online /in person) type and had presenting participants based in Australia, UK, Finland, Thailand, South Korea, Vietnam and Japan. Each invited speaker was asked to deliver a lecture composed of half educational material (pitched at the level of an advanced postgraduate student) and half cutting edge research material (gathered from their own studies). IUPAB funds were used to invite young researchers (postgraduate students and early career scientists) from both within Japan and countries in the near asian region who had an interest in learning about the theoretical and experimental basis of the AFM technique. This Editorial describes the workshop and introduces the written contributions from the invited lecturers.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.