ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2024
Quantifying 3D MR fingerprinting (3D-MRF) reproducibility across subjects, sessions, and scanners automatically using MNI atlases.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- A MR Fingerprinting Development Kit for Quantitative 3D Brain Imaging.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2026Article
- Dynamic Contrast Enhanced-Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting (DCE-MRF) Improves Detection of Induced Vascular Perfusion Reduction in a Mouse Breast Cancer Model.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Multiplexed magnetic resonance imaging.Nature · 2026Article
- Multi-scanner repeatability and reproducibility of qRF-MRF breath-held and free-breathing with pilot tone in the abdomen.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Equity and Generalizability of Radiomics in Orbital Disease: Challenges for Ophthalmology, Otolaryngology, and Plastic Surgery.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Contrast-optimized basis functions for self-navigated motion correction in quantitative MRI.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Adult brain T1 and T2 values measured at 3 T using magnetic resonance fingerprinting with phantom validation.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Article
- Rethinking MRI as a measurement device through modular and portable pipelines.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Review
- Quantifying 3D MR fingerprinting (3D-MRF) reproducibility across subjects, sessions, and scanners automatically using MNI atlases.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeQuantitative MRI techniques such as MR fingerprinting (MRF) promise more objective and comparable measurements of tissue properties at the point-of-care than weighted imaging. However, few direct cross-modal comparisons of MRF's repeatability and reproducibility versus weighted acquisitions have been performed. This work proposes a novel fully automated pipeline for quantitatively comparing cross-modal imaging performance in vivo via atlas-based sampling.
methodsWe acquire whole-brain 3D-MRF, turbo spin echo, and MPRAGE sequences three times each on two scanners across 10 subjects, for a total of 60 multimodal datasets. The proposed automated registration and analysis pipeline uses linear and nonlinear registration to align all qualitative and quantitative DICOM stacks to Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) 152 space, then samples each dataset's native space through transformation inversion to compare performance within atlas regions across subjects, scanners, and repetitions.
resultsVoxel values within MRF-derived maps were found to be more repeatable (σ
conclusionMRF data from many sessions and scanners can potentially be treated as a single dataset for harmonized analysis or longitudinal comparisons without the additional regularization steps needed for qualitative modalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.