Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38192225›Full record

ReviewClinical rehabilitation2024

Use of the Capability, Opportunity and Motivation Behaviour model (COM-B) to Understand Interventions to Support Physical Activity Behaviour in People with Stroke: An Overview of Reviews.

Sarah Paterson, Helen Dawes, Charlotte Winward, Emilia Bartram, Emma Dodds, Jane McKinon, Helen Gaskell, Johnny Collett

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical rehabilitation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah PatersonCentre for Movement, Occupation and Rehabilitation Sciences (MOReS), Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5398-6219
Helen DawesCollege of Medicine, Department of Public Health & Sports Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Medical School Building, College of Medicine and Health, Exeter, UK.
Charlotte WinwardAllied Health Professions Research Unit, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Emilia BartramOxford Centre for Enablement, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford, UK.
Emma DoddsOxford Centre for Enablement, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford, UK.
Jane McKinonOxford Centre for Enablement, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford, UK.
Helen GaskellOxford Centre for Enablement, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford, UK.
Johnny CollettCentre for Movement, Occupation and Rehabilitation Sciences (MOReS), Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4138-2589
Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre · GBOxford Brookes University · GBJohn Radcliffe Hospital · GBUniversity of Exeter · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePhysical activity in people with stroke remains low despite considerable research. This overview aimed to provide high-level synthesis and aid clinical decision-making. The Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behaviour (COM-B) model was used to classify interventions to understand which components improve physical activity behaviour in people with stroke. DATA SOURCES: CINAHL, Cochrane Database, MEDLINE, PEDro, PsychINFO, SPORTDiscus. REVIEW

methodsA systematic search was conducted (November 2023) to identify reviews of interventions to improve physical activity in people with stroke. Results were screened and assessed for eligibility. Participant characteristics, intervention classification using COM-B, and effect of intervention were extracted. Quality was assessed using AMSTAR2, and Corrected Cover Analysis for study overlap. Narrative synthesis was used to understand components of interventions to improve physical activity behaviour.

results1801 references were screened and 29 full-text references assessed for eligibility. Twenty reviews were included. Quality ranged from critically low (

conclusionInterventions including at least two elements of the COM-B are most likely to improve physical activity in mobile stroke survivors. Further research is needed to understand physical activity behaviour in those with moderate to severe stroke.

Indexed as

ExerciseMotivationStrokeStroke RehabilitationHealth BehaviorHumansbehaviour changeCOM-BoverviewPhysical activitystroke

Identifiers

PMID38192225
PMCPMC10898199
OpenAlexW4391493290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.