Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38192196›Full record

ArticleeLife2024

Experience shapes chandelier cell function and structure in the visual cortex.

Koen Seignette, Nora Jamann, Paolo Papale, Huub Terra, Ralph O Porneso, Leander de Kraker, Chris van der Togt, Maaike van der Aa, Paul Neering, Emma Ruimschotel and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The Highly Localized Interaction between Neurofascin-186 and Gliomedin Promotes Subcellular Innervation by the Chandelier Cell.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Theory of axo-axonic inhibition.PLoS computational biology · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Koen SeignetteDepartment of Molecular Visual Plasticity, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7398-6291
Nora JamannDepartment of Axonal Signaling, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Paolo PapaleDepartment of Vision & Cognition, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6249-841X
Huub TerraDepartment of Molecular Visual Plasticity, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Ralph O PornesoDepartment of Molecular Visual Plasticity, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-9659-525X
Leander de KrakerDepartment of Molecular Visual Plasticity, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Chris van der TogtDepartment of Molecular Visual Plasticity, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Maaike van der AaDepartment of Molecular Visual Plasticity, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Paul NeeringDepartment of Molecular Visual Plasticity, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Emma RuimschotelDepartment of Molecular Visual Plasticity, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Pieter R RoelfsemaDepartment of Vision & Cognition, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1625-0034
Jorrit S MontijnDepartment of Cortical Structure & Function, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Matthew W SelfDepartment of Vision & Cognition, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5731-579X
Maarten H P KoleDepartment of Axonal Signaling, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3883-5682
Christiaan N LeveltDepartment of Molecular Visual Plasticity, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1813-6243

Funding

European Commission 785907European Commission 945539Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek FlagEra Soundsight 680-91-320Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek OCENW.KLEIN.178
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Detailed characterization of interneuron types in primary visual cortex (V1) has greatly contributed to understanding visual perception, yet the role of chandelier cells (ChCs) in visual processing remains poorly characterized. Using viral tracing we found that V1 ChCs predominantly receive monosynaptic input from local layer 5 pyramidal cells and higher-order cortical regions. Two-photon calcium imaging and convolutional neural network modeling revealed that ChCs are visually responsive but weakly selective for stimulus content. In mice running in a virtual tunnel, ChCs respond strongly to events known to elicit arousal, including locomotion and visuomotor mismatch. Repeated exposure of the mice to the virtual tunnel was accompanied by reduced visual responses of ChCs and structural plasticity of ChC boutons and axon initial segment length. Finally, ChCs only weakly inhibited pyramidal cells. These findings suggest that ChCs provide an arousal-related signal to layer 2/3 pyramidal cells that may modulate their activity and/or gate plasticity of their axon initial segments during behaviorally relevant events.

Indexed as

NeuronsVisual CortexAnimalsArousalInterneuronsMicePyramidal Cellsarousalaxo-axonicchandelierinhibititionmost exciting inputmouseneuroscienceprediction error

Identifiers

PMID38192196
PMCPMC10963032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.