Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38192175›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental microbiology2024

Aedes aegypti gut transcriptomes respond differently to microbiome transplants from field-caught or laboratory-reared mosquitoes.

Shivanand Hegde, Laura E Brettell, Shannon Quek, Kayvan Etebari, Miguel A Saldaña, Sassan Asgari, Kerri L Coon, Eva Heinz, Grant L Hughes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Crosstalk in the cold: host-microbe interactions in insect diapause.Annals of the Entomological Society of America · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Update of
    2023
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Shivanand HegdeDepartments of Vector Biology and Tropical Disease Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7249-6795
Laura E BrettellDepartments of Vector Biology and Tropical Disease Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Shannon QuekDepartments of Vector Biology and Tropical Disease Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Kayvan EtebariAustralian Infectious Disease Research Centre, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Miguel A SaldañaDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA.
Sassan AsgariAustralian Infectious Disease Research Centre, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Kerri L CoonDepartment of Bacteriology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2701-5195
Eva HeinzDepartments of Vector Biology and Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Grant L HughesDepartments of Vector Biology and Tropical Disease Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.

Funding

EMERGING AND TROPICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASEST32AI007526 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BR GALVESTON · PI SOONG, LYNN · 1997 to 2025
$3.1M
Exploiting gnotobiotic systems to examine microbiota acquisition in mosquitoes and for microbiome transplantationsR21AI138074 · NIAID · TMLIVERPOOL SCHOOL OF TROPICAL MEDICINE · PI HUGHES, GRANT LESLIE · 2018 to 2019
$296k
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/T001240/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/V011278/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/W018446/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/X018024/1NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI138074NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007526
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mosquito microbiome is critical for host development and plays a major role in many aspects of mosquito biology. While the microbiome is commonly dominated by a small number of genera, there is considerable variation in composition among mosquito species, life stages, and geography. How the host controls and is affected by this variation is unclear. Using microbiome transplant experiments, we asked whether there were differences in transcriptional responses when mosquitoes of different species were used as microbiome donors. We used microbiomes from four different donor species spanning the phylogenetic breadth of the Culicidae, collected either from the laboratory or the field. We found that when recipients received a microbiome from a donor reared in the laboratory, the response was remarkably similar regardless of donor species. However, when the donor had been collected from the field, many more genes were differentially expressed. We also found that while the transplant procedure did have some effect on the host transcriptome, this is likely to have had a limited effect on mosquito fitness. Overall, our results highlight the possibility that variation in mosquito microbiome communities is associated with variability in host-microbiome interactions and further demonstrate the utility of the microbiome transplantation technique for investigating host-microbe interactions in mosquitoes.

Indexed as

AedesMicrobiotaAnimalsPhylogenyTranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID38192175
PMCPMC11022138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.