Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38192064›Full record

Trial reportMaternal & child nutrition2024

Efficacy of ready-to-use food supplement for treatment of moderate acute malnutrition among children aged 6 to 59 months.

Nyabasi Makori, Hope Masanja, Ray Masumo, Suleman Rashid, Theresia Jumbe, Meshack Tegeye, Debora Esau, Juliana Muiruri, Geofrey Mchau, Stanslaus H Mafung'a and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Maternal & child nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Nyabasi MakoriDepartment of Nutrition Education and Training (NET), Tanzania Food and Nutrition Centre, Dar es salaam, Tanzania.ORCID 0000-0002-5162-5145
Hope MasanjaDepartment of Nutrition Education and Training (NET), Tanzania Food and Nutrition Centre, Dar es salaam, Tanzania.
Ray MasumoDepartment of Nutrition Education and Training (NET), Tanzania Food and Nutrition Centre, Dar es salaam, Tanzania.
Suleman RashidDepartment of Food Science and Agroprocessing, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania.
Theresia JumbeDepartment of Food Science and Agroprocessing, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania.
Meshack TegeyeWorld Food Programme, Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania.
Debora EsauWorld Food Programme, Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania.
Juliana MuiruriWorld Food Programme, Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania.
Geofrey MchauDepartment of Nutrition Education and Training (NET), Tanzania Food and Nutrition Centre, Dar es salaam, Tanzania.
Stanslaus H Mafung'aDepartment of Nutrition Education and Training (NET), Tanzania Food and Nutrition Centre, Dar es salaam, Tanzania.
Cypriana MoshiDepartment of Nutrition Education and Training (NET), Tanzania Food and Nutrition Centre, Dar es salaam, Tanzania.ORCID 0000-0002-1967-9215
Neema ShoshoWorld Food Programme, Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania.
Vera KwaraWorld Food Programme, Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania.
Hoyce MshidaDepartment of Nutrition Education and Training (NET), Tanzania Food and Nutrition Centre, Dar es salaam, Tanzania.
Germana LeynaDepartment of Nutrition Education and Training (NET), Tanzania Food and Nutrition Centre, Dar es salaam, Tanzania.
Tanzania Food and Nutrition Center · TZWWF Tanzania · TZSokoine University of Agriculture · TZMuhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences · TZ

Funding

World Food Programme
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Moderate acute malnutrition (MAM) is a persistent public health problem in Tanzania. The current approach for its management is nutrition counselling. However, there has been no commercial production of ready-to-use supplementary foods for the management of MAM in the country but rather imported from companies outside the country. The objective of the study was to determine the ability of a ready-to-use food supplementation versus corn soya blend (CSB+) to manage MAM. The randomised controlled trial employed three parallel arm approach. The first arm received CSB+ and infant and young child feeding (IYCF) counselling, the second arm received ready-to-use food (RUF) and IYCF counselling and the third arm, a control group, received IYCF as standard care for three consecutive months. Results indicated that the overall proportion of children who recovered from MAM was 65.6%. There was a significant difference (p < 0.001) in the proportion of children who recovered from MAM between the three arms (CSB+, RUF and standard care). Results revealed further a high recovery rate of 83.7% in the RUF arm, followed by 71.9% in the CSB+ arm and 41% in the standard care arm. The risk differences for RUF compared with CSB+ and standard care were 11.8% and 42.7%, respectively. RUFs can be used as an alternative supplement to conventional CSB+ for the management of MAM in children and, thus, has the potential to scale up its use to address the problem of MAM among 6 to 59 months' children.

Indexed as

MalnutritionChild, PreschoolCounselingDietary SupplementsGlycine maxHumansInfantTanzaniachildren aged 6 to 59 monthsfood supplementmoderate acute malnutritionRUFundernutrition

Identifiers

PMID38192064
PMCPMC10981477
OpenAlexW4390745971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.