Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38191955›Full record

ArticleInsights into imaging2024

Ultrasound shear wave seeds reduced following hamstring strain injury but not after returning to sport.

Scott K Crawford, Christa M Wille, Mikel R Joachim, Kenneth S Lee, Bryan C Heiderscheit

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insights into imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Scott K CrawfordDepartment of Kinesiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1300 University Ave, Madison, WI, 53706, USA. skcrawford2@wisc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3385-0813
Christa M WilleDepartment of Orthopedics & Rehabilitation, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1685 Highland Ave, Madison, WI, 53705, USA.
Mikel R JoachimDepartment of Orthopedics & Rehabilitation, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1685 Highland Ave, Madison, WI, 53705, USA.
Kenneth S LeeDepartment of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Bryan C HeiderscheitDepartment of Orthopedics & Rehabilitation, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1685 Highland Ave, Madison, WI, 53705, USA.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

University of Wisconsin Institute for Clinical and Translational ResearchUL1TR002373 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI ELIZABETH S BURNSIDE, Allan R. Brasier · 2017 to 2026
$75.9M
Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR002374 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Bo Liu, Marin Leigh Schweizer · 2017 to 2026
$9.7M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002374NCATS NIH HHS KL2TR002374NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002373NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR002373
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe purpose of the study was to investigate differences in ultrasound shear wave speed (SWS) between uninjured and injured limbs following hamstring strain injury (HSI) at time of injury (TOI), return to sport (RTS), and 12 weeks after RTS (12wks).

methodsThis observational, prospective, cross-sectional design included male and female collegiate athletes who sustained an HSI. SWS imaging was performed at TOI, RTS, and 12wks with magnetic resonance imaging. SWS maps were acquired by a musculoskeletal-trained sonographer at the injury location of the injured limb and location-matched on the contralateral limb. The average SWS from three 5 mm diameter Q-boxes on each limb were used for analysis. A linear mixed effects model was performed to determine differences in SWS between limbs across the study time points.

resultsSWS was lower in the injured limb compared to the contralateral limb at TOI (uninjured - injured limb difference: 0.23 [0.05, 0.41] m/s, p = 0.006). No between-limb differences in SWS were observed at RTS (0.15 [-0.05, 0.36] m/s, p = 0.23) or 12wks (-0.11 [-0.41, 0.18] m/s, p = 0.84).

conclusionsThe SWS in the injured limb of collegiate athletes after HSI was lower compared to the uninjured limb at TOI but not at RTS or 12 weeks after RTS. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Hamstring strain injury with structural disruption can be detected by lower injured limb shear wave speed compared to the uninjured limb. Lack of between-limb differences at return to sport may demonstrate changes consistent with healing. Shear wave speed may complement traditional ultrasound or MRI for monitoring muscle injury. KEY POINTS: • Ultrasound shear wave speed can non-invasively measure tissue elasticity in muscle injury locations. • Injured limb time of injury shear wave speeds were lower versus uninjured limb but not thereafter. • Null return to sport shear wave speed differences may correspond to structural changes associated with healing. • Shear wave speed may provide quantitative measures for monitoring muscle elasticity during recovery.

Indexed as

College athletesElasticityHamstring MusclesUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID38191955
PMCPMC10774410
OpenAlexW4390660174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.