ArticleScientific reports2024
Dosimetric characterization of a novel UHDR megavoltage X-ray source for FLASH radiobiological experiments.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Harnessing the sparing effect of FLASH-RT: From phenomenon observation, radiophysical determinants to molecular mechanisms and synergistic strategies.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Quantifying the flash effect and its dependence on average dose rate in vivo for 6 MeV electron and 6 MV photon beams.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Development and characterization of phantoms to investigate the Flash effect withPhysics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2025Article
- Monte Carlo simulation of a novel medical linac concept for highly conformal x-ray FLASH cancer radiotherapy.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Evaluation of radiochromic formulations for dosimetry in high-energy photon and proton beams.Communications materials · 2025Article
- Respiratory-gated micro-computed tomography imaging to measure radiation-induced lung injuries in mice following ultra-high dose-rate and conventional dose-rate radiation therapy.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2025Article
- Experimental results of a 330 GW impedance-matched Marx generator.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
A first irradiation platform capable of delivering 10 MV X-ray beams at ultra-high dose rates (UHDR) has been developed and characterized for FLASH radiobiological research at TRIUMF. Delivery of both UHDR (FLASH mode) and low dose-rate conventional (CONV mode) irradiations was demonstrated using a common source and experimental setup. Dose rates were calculated using film dosimetry and a non-intercepting beam monitoring device; mean values for a 100 μA pulse (peak) current were nominally 82.6 and 4.40 × 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.