ArticleCardiovascular engineering and technology2024
Blood Pressure Estimation Based on PPG and ECG Signals Using Knowledge Distillation.
Article in Cardiovascular engineering and technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveEasy access bio-signals are useful for alleviating the shortcomings and difficulties associated with cuff-based and invasive blood pressure (BP) measurement techniques. This study proposes a deep learning model, trained using knowledge distillation, based on photoplethysmographic (PPG) and electrocardiogram (ECG) signals to estimate systolic and diastolic blood pressures.
methodsThe estimation model comprises convolutional layers followed by one bidirectional recurrent layer and attention layers. The training approach involves knowledge distillation, where a smaller model (student model) is trained by leveraging information from a larger model (teacher model).
resultsThe proposed multistage model was evaluated on 1205 subjects from Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC) III database using the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI) and the standards of the British Hypertension Society (BHS). The results revealed that our model performance achieved grade A in estimating both systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and met the requirements of the AAMI standard. After training with knowledge distillation (KD), the model achieved a mean absolute error and standard deviation of 2.94 ± 5.61 mmHg for SBP and 2.02 ± 3.60 mmHg for DBP.
conclusionOur results demonstrate the benefits of the knowledge distillation training method in reducing the number of parameters and improving the predictive accuracy of the blood pressure regression model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38191807What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.