ArticleSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2024
Massa intermedia in adults: incidence, dimension, location and clinical importance.
Article in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interhypothalamic adhesions: prevalence, structure, and location-based classification map in pediatric patients undergoing MRI.Neuroradiology · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis retrospective magnetic resonance imaging investigation aimed to obtain information related to the anatomy of the massa intermedia (MI) in an adult population.
methodsThe work conducted on MRI views of 1058 (539 males and 519 females) healthy adult samples aged with 48.93 ± 17.63 years. Initially, the presence or absence of MI was noted, and then if present, its numbers and location in the third ventricle were recorded. Its horizontal (HDMI) and vertical (VDMI) diameters were measured on MRI views, while the cross-sectional area (CSAMI) was calculated using its diameters.
resultsMI was missing in 2.6% (27 cases) of 1058 adult samples. Six subjects (0.6%) had a double MI. HDMI, VDMI and CSAMI were measured as 4.83 ± 1.01 mm, 4.86 ± 0.98 mm, and 19.11 ± 7.23 mm
conclusionsThe size, position and incidence of MI were not affected by sex, and its position and incidence were not affected by adult age periods. In adults, MI size demonstrated a significant decrease in the middle age.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.