ReviewCell and tissue banking2024
An important detail that is still not clear in amniotic membrane applications: How do we store the amniotic membrane best?
Review in Cell and tissue banking, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Determinants of extraction efficiency in human amniotic membrane processing: biological, mechanical, and biochemical factors shaping growth factor yield.Cell and tissue banking · 2026Review
- Beyond transplants: current and future therapeutic potential of amniotic membrane extract (AME) in ophthalmology.Regenerative medicineReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of fresh amniotic membrane (AM) is not a viable option, as it has many disadvantages. Preserving the AM reduces the risk of cross-infection and maintains its effectiveness for a long time. In order to maximize the therapeutic effects of the AM, the basic need is to preserve its vitality and the bioactive molecules it contains. However, the effect of preservation procedures on cell viability and growth factors is a still matter of debate. Optimum preservation method is expected to be cost-effective, easily-accessible, and most importantly, to preserve the effectiveness of the tissue for the longest time. However, each preservation technique has its advantages and disadvantages over the other, and each one compromises the vitality and bioactive molecules of the tissue to some extent. Therefore, the best method of preservation is still controversial, and the question of 'how to preserve the AM best?' has not yet been definitively answered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38191687What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.