ArticleNature biotechnology2024
It takes two to think.
Article in Nature biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- A kinetic proofreading argument to understand the role of H3K9 trimethylation in phase-separated chromatin states.Biophysical journal · 2026Article
- A career as a biologist-a lifelong morphogenetic process.Developmental biology · 2025Article
- Openness guides discovery.Nature biotechnology · 2025Article
- Academic mentees thrive in big groups, but survive in small groups.Nature human behaviour · 2025Article
- Sex differences in age-associated neurological diseases-A roadmap for reliable and high-yield research.Science advances · 2025Review
- Competency in invasion science: addressing stagnation challenges by promoting innovation and creative thinking.Environmental management · 2024Article
- Building machines that learn and think with people.Nature human behaviour · 2024Review
- The importance of community as a pre-tenure faculty member.Nature chemistry · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
38191661What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.