ArticleScientific reports2024
Exploring health literacy categories among an Iranian adult sample: a latent class analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Teach back educational strategy on knowledge about breast cancer among low health literate women.BMC medical education · 2024Trial
- Predictors of knowledge and attitudes toward palliative care among patients with cancer: a cross-sectional study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Deciphering the Data: Health Numeracy and Its Impact on Decision-Making in Breast Augmentation.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Article
- Validation of a health literacy assessment tool in a nationwide population: a measurement invariance study using confirmatory factor analysis and multiple-group latent class analysis.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Latent profile analysis of medication adherence in lower extremity deep venous thrombosis-cross-sectional study.PloS one · 2026Article
- Chinese patients' use of online healthcare services: an empirical analysis based on Chinese Social Survey 2021 (CSS2021) data.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Article
- Health literacy disparities in South Korea: insights from a latent profile analysis.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Patterns and associated factors of health literacy among residents aged 15-69 in Zhejiang, China: a latent profile analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- The impact of electronic health literacy on emotional management ability among college students: the mediating roles of peer relationships and exercise self-efficacy.BMC psychology · 2024Article
- The impact of internet health information usage habits on older adults' e-health literacy.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
General and electronic health literacy are important factors engaging in healthy behaviors and maintaining good health. The present study explored demographic factors associated with general and electronic health literacy in the Iranian adult population. Via stratified cluster sampling, trained interviewers visited adult residents in Qazvin Province, Iran between January, and April 2022. The participants (N = 9775; mean age = 36.44 years; 6576 [67.3%] females) completed the Health Literacy Instrument for Adults (HELIA) assessing health literacy and the eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS) assessing electronic health literacy. Demographic data, including age, gender, educational level, marital status, and living location (city or rural), were collected. Latent class analysis (LCA) was used to classify the participants into different health literacy/electronic health literacy levels. The relationships between health literacy/electronic health literacy levels and demographic factors were examined using χ
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.