Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38191568›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

Microbially mediated mechanisms underlie soil carbon accrual by conservation agriculture under decade-long warming.

Jing Tian, Jennifer A J Dungait, Ruixing Hou, Ye Deng, Iain P Hartley, Yunfeng Yang, Yakov Kuzyakov, Fusuo Zhang, M Francesca Cotrufo, Jizhong Zhou

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
51.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 154 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Silk-trehalose seed coating technology preservesFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Jing Tian *State Key Laboratory of Nutrient Use and Management, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, 100193, Beijing, PR China. tianj@cau.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-8116-8520
Jennifer A J Dungait *Geography, Faculty of Environment, Science and Economy, University of Exeter, Rennes Drive, Exeter, EX4 4RJ, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9074-4174
Ruixing Hou *Key Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), 100101, Beijing, PR China.
Ye Deng *CAS Key Laboratory for Environmental Biotechnology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100085, Beijing, PR China.ORCID 0000-0002-7584-0632
Iain P HartleyGeography, Faculty of Environment, Science and Economy, University of Exeter, Rennes Drive, Exeter, EX4 4RJ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9183-6617
Yunfeng YangState Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control, School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing, PR China.ORCID 0000-0001-8274-6196
Yakov KuzyakovDepartment of Soil Science of Temperate Ecosystems, University of Göttingen, 37077, Göttingen, Germany.
Fusuo ZhangState Key Laboratory of Nutrient Use and Management, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, 100193, Beijing, PR China. zhangfs@cau.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0001-8971-0129
M Francesca CotrufoDepartment of Soil and Crop Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA. Francesca.Cotrufo@colostate.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-6191-8953
Jizhong ZhouInstitute for Environmental Genomics, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA. jzhou@ou.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-2014-0564
China Agricultural University · CNChinese Academy of Sciences · CNUniversity of Exeter · GBColorado State University · USLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory · USState Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control · CNUniversity of Göttingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increasing soil organic carbon (SOC) in croplands by switching from conventional to conservation management may be hampered by stimulated microbial decomposition under warming. Here, we test the interactive effects of agricultural management and warming on SOC persistence and underlying microbial mechanisms in a decade-long controlled experiment on a wheat-maize cropping system. Warming increased SOC content and accelerated fungal community temporal turnover under conservation agriculture (no tillage, chopped crop residue), but not under conventional agriculture (annual tillage, crop residue removed). Microbial carbon use efficiency (CUE) and growth increased linearly over time, with stronger positive warming effects after 5 years under conservation agriculture. According to structural equation models, these increases arose from greater carbon inputs from the crops, which indirectly controlled microbial CUE via changes in fungal communities. As a result, fungal necromass increased from 28 to 53%, emerging as the strongest predictor of SOC content. Collectively, our results demonstrate how management and climatic factors can interact to alter microbial community composition, physiology and functions and, in turn, SOC formation and accrual in croplands.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaSoilAgricultureCarbonCrops, AgriculturalCarbonSoil

Identifiers

PMID38191568
PMCPMC10774409
OpenAlexW4390659573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.