Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38191560›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Testing the effectiveness of interactive training on sexual harassment and assault in field science.

Melissa R Cronin, Erika S Zavaleta, Roxanne S Beltran, Melanie Esparza, Allison R Payne, Valerie Termini, Joseph Thompson, Megan S Jones

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Melissa R CroninDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA. melissa.cronin@duke.edu.
Erika S ZavaletaDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA.
Roxanne S BeltranDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA.
Melanie EsparzaDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA.
Allison R PayneDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA.
Valerie TerminiCalifornia Department of Fish and Wildlife, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Joseph ThompsonLos Angeles County Department of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Megan S JonesU.S. Geological Survey, Oregon Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA. megan.jones@oregonstate.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-4284-3650

Funding

California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) 21-1156California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) P2190010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fieldwork is a critical tool for scientific research, particularly in applied disciplines. Yet fieldwork is often unsafe, especially for members of historically marginalized groups and people whose presence in scientific spaces threatens traditional hierarchies of power, authority, and legitimacy. Research is needed to identify interventions that prevent sexual harassment and assault from occurring in the first place. We conducted a quasi-experiment assessing the impacts of a 90-min interactive training on field-based staff in a United States state government agency. We hypothesized that the knowledge-based interventions, social modeling, and mastery experiences included in the training would increase participants' sexual harassment and assault prevention knowledge, self-efficacy, behavioural intention, and behaviour after the training compared to a control group of their peers. Treatment-control and pre-post training survey data indicate that the training increased participants' sexual harassment and assault prevention knowledge and prevention self-efficacy, and, to a lesser extent, behavioural intention. These increases persisted several months after the training for knowledge and self-efficacy. While we did not detect differences in the effect of the training for different groups, interestingly, post-hoc tests indicated that women and members of underrepresented racial groups generally scored lower compared to male and white respondents, suggesting that these groups self-assess their own capabilities differently. Finally, participants' likelihood to report incidents increased after the training but institutional reports remained low, emphasizing the importance of efforts to transform reporting systems and develop better methods to measure bystander actions. These results support the utility of a peer-led interactive intervention for improving workplace culture and safety in scientific fieldwork settings. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: "The stage 1 protocol for this Registered Report was accepted in principle on August 24, 2022. The protocol, as accepted by the journal, can be found at: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.21770165 .

Indexed as

Sexual HarassmentFemaleGroup ProcessesHealth FacilitiesHumansIntentionKnowledgeMale

Identifiers

PMID38191560
PMCPMC10774269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.