ArticleScientific reports2024
Subcortical responses to music and speech are alike while cortical responses diverge.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- A DEEP NEURAL NETWORK FOR PREDICTING CONTINUOUS HUMAN EEG ACROSS THE AUDITORY PATHWAY IN RESPONSE TO SOUND.ArXiv · 2026Article
- Very Early Cortical Auditory Responses to Speech in Humans.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Categorization of and Adaptation to Human Voice and Musical Instruments: A Passive Listening EEG Study.Journal of cognitive neuroscience · 2026Article
- Chimeric Music Reveals an Interaction of Pitch and Time in Electrophysiological Signatures of Music Encoding.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026Article
- The auditory brainstem response to natural speech is not affected by selective attention.PLoS biology · 2025Article
- Article
- Exploring Relevant Features for EEG-Based Investigation of Sound Perception in Naturalistic Soundscapes.eNeuro · 2025Article
- Modelling neural coding in the auditory midbrain with high resolution and accuracy.Nature machine intelligence · 2025Article
- Comparing methods for deriving the auditory brainstem response to continuous speech in human listeners.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- The effect of speech masking on the human subcortical response to continuous speech.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Fundamental frequency predominantly drives talker differences in auditory brainstem responses to continuous speech.JASA express letters · 2024Article
- Article
- Auditory Encoding of Natural Speech at Subcortical and Cortical Levels Is Not Indicative of Cognitive Decline.eNeuro · 2024Article
- Article
- Optimal Parameters for Measuring Multiband Auditory Brainstem Responses to Continuous Speech.Trends in hearingArticle
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Music and speech are encountered daily and are unique to human beings. Both are transformed by the auditory pathway from an initial acoustical encoding to higher level cognition. Studies of cortex have revealed distinct brain responses to music and speech, but differences may emerge in the cortex or may be inherited from different subcortical encoding. In the first part of this study, we derived the human auditory brainstem response (ABR), a measure of subcortical encoding, to recorded music and speech using two analysis methods. The first method, described previously and acoustically based, yielded very different ABRs between the two sound classes. The second method, however, developed here and based on a physiological model of the auditory periphery, gave highly correlated responses to music and speech. We determined the superiority of the second method through several metrics, suggesting there is no appreciable impact of stimulus class (i.e., music vs speech) on the way stimulus acoustics are encoded subcortically. In this study's second part, we considered the cortex. Our new analysis method resulted in cortical music and speech responses becoming more similar but with remaining differences. The subcortical and cortical results taken together suggest that there is evidence for stimulus-class dependent processing of music and speech at the cortical but not subcortical level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.