Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38191446›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2024

Predictors of hospital nursing staff's adherence to safe injection guidelines: application of the protection motivation theory in Fars province, Iran.

Masoud Karimi, Zakieh Khoramaki, Maryam Rabiey Faradonbeh, Maryam Ghaedi, Fatemeh Ashoori, Abdolrahim Asadollahi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Masoud KarimiResearch Center for Health Sciences, Institute of Health, Department of Health Promotion, School of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. karimeim@sums.ac.ir.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7931-4181
Zakieh KhoramakiDepartment of Health Promotion, School of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3877-9617
Maryam Rabiey FaradonbehDepartment of Health Promotion, School of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3666-0724
Maryam GhaediDepartment of Health Promotion, School of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6432-2170
Fatemeh AshooriDepartment of Health Promotion, School of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0993-9773
Abdolrahim AsadollahiResearch Center for Health Sciences, Institute of Health, Department of Gerontology, School of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2265-5641
Shiraz University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeedle stick injuries (NSI) can lead to dangerous infectious diseases for health care workers. This study aimed to determine the predictors of observance of safe injection guidelines in hospital nursing staff, based on protection motivation theory.

methodsThis cross-sectional study was conducted on the nursing staff of five randomly selected teaching and general hospitals of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Fars province, Iran, in 2021. Data were collected using a researcher-made questionnaire which was developed based on protection motivation theory. Data were processed and analyzed using SPSS 22 and Amos 24 at a significance level of  < 0.05. Pearson's correlation coefficient, Multiple linear regression, and Structural Equation Modeling were used.

resultsThe mean age of the participants (No = 280) was 32.5 ± 8.09 years. Most of the participants [80%] had encountered NSI, patients' blood, or body fluids at least once. Protection motivation was the only predictor of protective behaviors (β = 0.573), while perceived efficacy (β = 0.142) and perceived rewards (β = -0.229) were the strongest predictors of motivation. The structural equation modeling analysis showed that standardized total effects of protection motivation, perceived response costs, rewards, and efficacy on the protective behaviors were 0.573, -0.159, -.104, and 0.81, respectively. While standardized total effects of perceived rewards, efficacy, and response cost on protection motivation were -0.229, 0.142, and -0.033, respectively. The model fit indices indicated the acceptable final model fit.

conclusionThe results suggest that perceived efficacy, perceived effectiveness, and perceived rewards were the most important predictors of adherence to Safe Injection Guidelines in nursing staff.

Indexed as

Guideline AdherenceMotivationNeedle-Stick InjuriesNursing staff

Identifiers

PMID38191446
PMCPMC10775610
OpenAlexW4390744433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.