Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38191445›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2024

Mini-AFTERc: a controlled pilot trial of a nurse-led psychological intervention for fear of breast cancer recurrence.

Calum McHale, Susanne Cruickshank, Tamara Brown, Claire Torrens, Jo Armes, Deborah Fenlon, Elspeth Banks, Tom Kelsey, Gerald Humphris

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Calum McHaleMedical School, North Haugh, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Fife, KY16 9TF, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9274-7261
Susanne CruickshankRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0204-4739
Tamara BrownLeeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1069-4627
Claire TorrensNMAHP Research Unit, Stirling, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3883-2502
Jo ArmesUniversity of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7994-0796
Deborah FenlonUniversity of Swansea, Wales, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7347-8919
Elspeth BanksIndependent Cancer Patients' Voice, Carluke, Scotland, UK.
Tom KelseyComputer Science, North Haugh, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Fife, KY16 9TF, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8091-1458
Gerald HumphrisMedical School, North Haugh, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Fife, KY16 9TF, UK. gmh4@st-andrews.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4601-8834

Funding

Chief Scientist Office HIPS/17/57
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo determine the feasibility and acceptability of implementing the Mini-AFTERc intervention.

designNon-randomised cluster-controlled pilot trial.

settingFour NHS out-patient breast cancer centres in Scotland.

participantsNinety-two women who had successfully completed primary treatment for breast cancer were screened for moderate levels of fear of cancer recurrence (FCR). Forty-five were eligible (17 intervention and 28 control) and 34 completed 3-month follow-up (15 intervention and 21 control).

interventionMini-AFTERc, a single brief (30 min) structured telephone discussion with a specialist breast cancer nurse (SBCN) trained to target the antecedents of FCR. OUTCOMES: Feasibility and acceptability of Mini-AFTERc and the study design were assessed via recruitment, consent, retention rates, patient outcomes (measured at baseline, 2, 4, and 12 weeks), and post-study interviews with participants and SBCNs, which were guided by Normalisation Process Theory.

resultsMini-AFTERc was acceptable to patients and SBCNs. SBCNs believe the implementation of Mini-AFTERc to be feasible and an extension of discussions that already happen routinely. SBCNs believe delivery, however, at the scale required would be challenging given current competing demands for their time. Recruitment was impacted by variability in the follow-up practices of cancer centres and COVID-19 lockdown. Consent and follow-up procedures worked well, and retention rates were high.

conclusionsThe study provided invaluable information about the potential challenges and solutions for testing the Mini-AFTERc intervention more widely where limiting high FCR levels is an important goal following recovery from primary breast cancer treatment.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT0376382 . Registered on 4 December 2018.

Identifiers

PMID38191445
PMCPMC10773079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.