Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38191398›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2024

Understanding health care pathways of patients with sepsis: protocol of a mixed-methods analysis of health care utilization, experiences, and needs of patients with and after sepsis.

Carolin Fleischmann-Struzek, Norman Rose, Bianka Ditscheid, Lea Draeger, Patrik Dröge, Antje Freytag, Ludwig Goldhahn, Lena Kannengießer, Aurelia Kimmig, Claudia Matthäus-Krämer and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. AQP3 and AQP9-Contrary Players in Sepsis?International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Carolin Fleischmann-StruzekInstitute of Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, Jena University Hospital, Stoystraße 3, 07743, Jena, Germany. Carolin.fleischmann@med.uni-jena.de.
Norman RoseInstitute of Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, Jena University Hospital, Stoystraße 3, 07743, Jena, Germany.
Bianka DitscheidInstitute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Lea DraegerInstitute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Patrik DrögeAOK Research Institute (WIdO), Berlin, Germany.
Antje FreytagInstitute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Ludwig GoldhahnInstitute of Social Medicine and Health Systems Research (ISMHSR), Otto-Von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Lena KannengießerInstitute of Social Medicine and Health Systems Research (ISMHSR), Otto-Von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Aurelia KimmigInstitute of Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, Jena University Hospital, Stoystraße 3, 07743, Jena, Germany.
Claudia Matthäus-KrämerInstitute of Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, Jena University Hospital, Stoystraße 3, 07743, Jena, Germany.
Thomas RuhnkeAOK Research Institute (WIdO), Berlin, Germany.
Konrad ReinhartSepsis Foundation, Berlin, Germany.
Peter SchlattmannInstitute of Medical Statistics, Computer and Data Sciences, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Konrad SchmidtInstitute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Josephine StorchInstitute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Ruben UlbrichInstitute of Social Medicine and Health Systems Research (ISMHSR), Otto-Von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Susanne UllmannSepsis Foundation, Berlin, Germany.
Lisa WedekindInstitute of Medical Statistics, Computer and Data Sciences, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Enno SwartInstitute of Social Medicine and Health Systems Research (ISMHSR), Otto-Von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.

Funding

G-BA lnnovationsfonds 01VSF21031
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSepsis is associated with about 20% of deaths worldwide. It often presents with non-specific initial symptoms, making its emergency treatment an interdisciplinary and cross-sectoral challenge. Three in four sepsis survivors suffers from new cognitive, psychological, or physical sequelae for which specific treatment concepts are scarce. The AVENIR project aims to improve the understanding of patient pathways, and subjective care experiences and needs along the entire healthcare pathway before, with and after sepsis. Based on this, concrete recommendations for the organization of care and patient information materials will be developed with close patient participation.

methodsMixed-methods study including (1) analysis of anonymized nationwide health claims data from Germany, (2) linkage of health claims data with patient care reports (PCR) of emergency medical services from study regions in two federal states within Germany, and (3) qualitative exploration of the patient, relative, and care provider perspective on sepsis care. In (1), we analyze inpatient and outpatient health care utilization until 30 days pre-sepsis; clinical sepsis care including intra- and inter-hospital transfers; and rehabilitation, inpatient and outpatient aftercare of sepsis survivors as well as costs for health care utilization until 24 months post-sepsis. We attempt to identify survivor classes with similar health care utilization by Latent Class Analyses. In (2), PCR are linked with health claims data to establish a comprehensive database outlining care pathways for sepsis patients from pre-hospital to follow-up. We investigate e.g., whether correct initial assessment is associated with acute (e.g., same-day lethality) and long-term (e.g., new need for care, long-term mortality) outcomes of patients. We compare the performance of sepsis-specific screening tools such as qSOFA, NEWS-2 or PRESEP in the pre-clinical setting. In (3), semi-structured interviews as well as synchronous and asynchronous online focus groups are conducted and analyzed using qualitative content analyses techniques. DISCUSSION: The results of the AVENIR study will contribute to a deeper understanding of sepsis care pathways in Germany. They may serve as a base for improvements and innovations in sepsis care, that in the long-term can contribute to reduce the personal, medical, and societal burden of sepsis and its sepsis sequelae.

trial registrationRegistered at German Clinical Trial Register (ID: DRKS00031302, date of registration: 5th May 2023).

Indexed as

Critical PathwaysSepsisDisease ProgressionHumansInpatientsOutpatientsPatient Acceptance of Health CareAftercareBarriersEarly recognitionEmergency medical servicesHealth service researchInterviewMixed-methodsPost-Sepsis SyndromeQualitative researchSepsisSeptic shock

Identifiers

PMID38191398
PMCPMC10773042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.