Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38191393›Full record

ReviewBMC ophthalmology2024

Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty after failed penetrating keratoplasty- case series and review of the literature.

Agata Anna Wykrota, Loïc Hamon, Loay Daas, Berthold Seitz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. FromJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. DMEK, DSAEK, and repeat PKP for endothelial failure after PKP: systematic review and meta-analysis with a graphical synthesis of clinical decision factors.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Review
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Prescription patterns in DMEK: European survey.Journal of cataract and refractive surgery · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Agata Anna WykrotaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Saarland University Medical Center (UKS), Kirrberger Straße 100, Building 22, 66421, Homburg/Saar, Germany. agata.wykrota@uks.eu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2980-0154
Loïc HamonDepartment of Ophthalmology, Saarland University Medical Center (UKS), Kirrberger Straße 100, Building 22, 66421, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Loay DaasDepartment of Ophthalmology, Saarland University Medical Center (UKS), Kirrberger Straße 100, Building 22, 66421, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Berthold SeitzDepartment of Ophthalmology, Saarland University Medical Center (UKS), Kirrberger Straße 100, Building 22, 66421, Homburg/Saar, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aims to evaluate visual outcome, central corneal thickness, and re-bubbling rate in a cohort with undersized sequential Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) due to endothelial graft decompensation following primary penetrating keratoplasty (PK).

methodsAll patients who received a sequential DMEK (n = 16) or triple DMEK (n = 2) after failed primary PK between November 2020 and June 2022 were retrospectively evaluated. Analyzed parameters were corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), central corneal thickness (CCT), re-bubbling rate and graft survival.

results18 eyes of 18 patients were included. All patients underwent a DMEK with undersized graft after failed PK(s). Mean time between the last PK and DMEK was 102 ± 82 weeks. Mean follow-up time was 8.9 ± 4.6 months. CDVA increased significantly from 1.12 ± 0.60 logMAR preoperatively to 0.64 ± 0.49 logMAR 6 weeks postoperatively (p = 0.013). Mean CCT decreased significantly from 807 ± 224 μm before to 573 ± 151 μm 6 weeks after DMEK (p = 0.003). Re-bubbling was necessary in eight eyes (44.4%) after a median time of 7 days. The 12-month Kaplan Meier survival was 66.7%.

conclusionIn case of endothelial graft decompensation without stromal scars after primary PK, a DMEK can be performed for selected patients who had satisfying CDVA before the endothelial decompensation. Prior to DMEK indication, an AS-OCT should routinely be performed to circularly search for posterior steps at the PK graft margin, as well as shortly after DMEK to exclude a detachment of the endothelial graft. All patients should be informed about a higher re-bubbling rate in comparison to primary DMEK.

Indexed as

Corneal TransplantationKeratoplasty, PenetratingDescemet MembraneEyeHumansRetrospective StudiesCorneaDescemet Membrane Endothelial KeratoplastyGraft failureGraft undersizingSequential keratoplasty

Identifiers

PMID38191393
PMCPMC10775423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.