Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38191336›Full record

Trial reportBMC public health2024

Addressing help-seeking, stigma and risk factors for suicidality in secondary schools: short-term and mid-term effects of the HEYLiFE suicide prevention program in a randomized controlled trial.

Luna Grosselli, Susanne Knappe, Julia Baumgärtel, Ute Lewitzka, Jürgen Hoyer

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Luna Grosselli *Fakultät Psychologie, Institut für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany. luna.grosselli@tu-dresden.de.
Susanne Knappe *Fakultät Psychologie, Institut für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Julia BaumgärtelFakultät Psychologie, Institut für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Ute LewitzkaWerner-Felber-Institut e. V, Dresden, Germany.
Jürgen HoyerFakultät Psychologie, Institut für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
TU Dresden · DEKlinik und Poliklinik für Psychotherapie und Psychosomatik · DEUniversity Hospital Carl Gustav Carus · DE

Funding

German Federal Ministry of Health ZMVI1-2517FSB148
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSuicidal ideation and suicide attempts present a serious public health concern among adolescents and young adults. School-based suicide prevention programs are a key tool for addressing this problem. However, more research is necessary to assess their effectiveness, acceptability, and safety. In response, the HEYLiFE suicide prevention program was developed to enhance help-seeking, reduce stigma towards suicidal peers and diminish risk factors for suicidality. This article presents the evaluation findings of the HEYLiFE program in German secondary schools.

methodsWe conducted a randomized-controlled trial measuring short-term pre-post within-group effects in the intervention group only and mid-term effects at 6-months-follow-up compared to a waitlist-control group. Schools were assigned randomly to the intervention or control group (no blinding). We recruited students ≥12 years of age. Primary outcomes were knowledge about suicidality, attitudes towards suicidality, stigma towards a suicidal peer, help-seeking intentions and behaviours, risk factors for suicidality. The data was analysed with linear mixed models and generalized linear mixed models.

resultsA total of N = 745 students participated (n = 353 intervention group, n = 392 control group). We observed favourable short-term effects on knowledge, attitudes towards suicidality and fear towards a suicidal peer. Unexpectedly, the program also led to an increase in desire for social distance and a decrease in prosocial emotions towards a suicidal peer. The mid-term effects of the program were exclusively favourable, resulting in enhanced attitudes towards help-seeking while protecting from a sharper rise in risk-factors for suicidality and from an increase in social distance. The program had more favourable effects on females and on students aged >13 years. The program was well-received by the students, and no serious adverse events were reported.

conclusionsThese findings demonstrate the effectiveness of the HEYLiFE universal suicide prevention program in addressing variables associated with suicidal ideation and suicide attempts among adolescents on the mid-term. The short-term negative effects on stigma and more negative effects on males should be addressed in the future. Future evaluation studies should examine its effects on suicidality and its effectiveness within populations at high risk.

trial registrationThe study was preregistered in the German Clinical Trials Register (registration number: DRKS00017045; registration date: 02/04/2019).

Indexed as

Suicidal IdeationSuicideAdolescentChildFemaleHumansMaleRisk FactorsSocial StigmaSuicide PreventionYoung AdultAdolescentsPreventionProgramRandomized-controlled trialSchoolSuicideYouth

Identifiers

PMID38191336
PMCPMC10773084
OpenAlexW4390669301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.