Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38190885›Full record

ArticleAcademic pediatrics

Adolescent, Parent, and Provider Perceptions of a Predictive Algorithm to Identify Adolescent Suicide Risk in Primary Care.

Molly Davis, Gillian C Dysart, Stephanie K Doupnik, Megan E Hamm, Karen T G Schwartz, Brandie George-Milford, Neal D Ryan, Nadine M Melhem, Stephanie D Stepp, David A Brent and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Academic pediatrics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Molly DavisDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (M Davis, GC Dysart, KTG Schwartz, and JF Young), Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa; PolicyLab (M Davis, GC Dysart, SK Doupnik, KTG Schwartz, and JF Young), Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa; Clinical Futures (M Davis and SK Doupnik), Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa; Department of Psychiatry (M Davis and JF Young), University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa; Penn Implementation Science Center at the Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics (PISCE@LDI) (M Davis and SK Doupnik), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa. Electronic address: davismf@chop.edu.
Gillian C DysartDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (M Davis, GC Dysart, KTG Schwartz, and JF Young), Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa; PolicyLab (M Davis, GC Dysart, SK Doupnik, KTG Schwartz, and JF Young), Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa.
Stephanie K DoupnikPolicyLab (M Davis, GC Dysart, SK Doupnik, KTG Schwartz, and JF Young), Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa; Clinical Futures (M Davis and SK Doupnik), Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa; Penn Implementation Science Center at the Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics (PISCE@LDI) (M Davis and SK Doupnik), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa; Division of General Pediatrics (SK Doupnik), Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa; Department of Pediatrics (SK Doupnik), University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa.
Megan E HammDepartment of Medicine (ME Hamm), University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pa.
Karen T G SchwartzDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (M Davis, GC Dysart, KTG Schwartz, and JF Young), Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa; PolicyLab (M Davis, GC Dysart, SK Doupnik, KTG Schwartz, and JF Young), Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa.
Brandie George-MilfordUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center Western Psychiatric Hospital (B George-Milford and DA Brent), Pittsburgh, Pa.
Neal D RyanDepartment of Psychiatry (ND Ryan, NM Melhem, SD Stepp, and DA Brent), University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pa; Clinical and Translational Science Institute (ND Ryan), University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pa.
Nadine M MelhemDepartment of Psychiatry (ND Ryan, NM Melhem, SD Stepp, and DA Brent), University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pa.
Stephanie D SteppDepartment of Psychiatry (ND Ryan, NM Melhem, SD Stepp, and DA Brent), University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pa.
David A BrentUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center Western Psychiatric Hospital (B George-Milford and DA Brent), Pittsburgh, Pa; Department of Psychiatry (ND Ryan, NM Melhem, SD Stepp, and DA Brent), University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pa.
Jami F YoungDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (M Davis, GC Dysart, KTG Schwartz, and JF Young), Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa; PolicyLab (M Davis, GC Dysart, SK Doupnik, KTG Schwartz, and JF Young), Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa; Department of Psychiatry (M Davis and JF Young), University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa.

Funding

The Center for Enhancing Triage and Utilization for Depression and Emergent Suicidality (ETUDES) in Pediatric Primary CareP50MH115838 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Charles Richard Jonassaint · 2018 to 2026
$25.5M
NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH115838
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo understand adolescent, parent, and provider perceptions of a machine learning algorithm for detecting adolescent suicide risk prior to its implementation primary care.

methodsWe conducted semi-structured, qualitative interviews with adolescents (n = 9), parents (n = 12), and providers (n = 10; mixture of behavioral health and primary care providers) across two major health systems. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed with analyses supported by use of NVivo. A codebook was developed combining codes derived inductively from interview transcripts and deductively from implementation science frameworks for content analysis.

resultsReactions to the algorithm were mixed. While many participants expressed privacy concerns, they believed the algorithm could be clinically useful for identifying adolescents at risk for suicide and facilitating follow-up. Parents' past experiences with their adolescents' suicidal thoughts and behaviors contributed to their openness to the algorithm. Results also aligned with several key Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research domains. For example, providers mentioned barriers inherent to the primary care setting such as time and resource constraints likely to impact algorithm implementation. Participants also cited a climate of mistrust of science and health care as potential barriers.

conclusionsFindings shed light on factors that warrant consideration to promote successful implementation of suicide predictive algorithms in pediatric primary care. By attending to perspectives of potential end users prior to the development and testing of the algorithm, we can ensure that the risk prediction methods will be well-suited to the providers who would be interacting with them and the families who could benefit.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsParentsPrimary Health CareAdolescentAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleHumansMachine LearningMaleQualitative ResearchRisk AssessmentSuicidal IdeationSuicideSuicide Preventionadolescentalgorithmpredictionprimary caresuicide

Identifiers

PMID38190885
PMCPMC11056301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.