Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38190847›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of international medical research2024

Application of five risk stratification tools for syncope in older adults.

Hong Mu, Jiexin Liu, Cheng Huang, Hefei Tang, Sisi Li, Chang Dong, Tiecheng Yang, Limin Liu, Bin Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of international medical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Hong MuDepartment of Emergency, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Jiexin LiuDepartment of Neurocardiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Cheng HuangPingmo Health Center, Daozhen County, Zunyi, Guizhou, China.
Hefei TangDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Sisi LiThe Fifth Medical College, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Chang DongThe Fifth Medical College, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Tiecheng YangDepartment of Emergency, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Limin LiuDepartment of Cardiology, Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Bin XuDepartment of Emergency, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6195-7015

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTreatment of syncope in older adults places a burden on healthcare systems. We used five risk stratification tools to predict short-term adverse outcomes in older patients with syncope.

methodsThis was a retrospective analysis of patients with syncope (age ≥60 years) in the emergency department of an urban academic hospital. The data were evaluated using the Risk Stratification of Syncope in the Emergency Department (ROSE), San Francisco Syncope Rule (SFSR), FAINT, Canadian Syncope Risk Score (CSRS), and Boston Syncope Criteria (BSC) tools. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive and negative predictive value (NPV), and positive and negative likelihood ratios of each tool were calculated and compared for adverse events within 1 month.

resultsIn total, 221 patients (average age 75.6 years) were analyzed. Fifty-nine patients (26.7%) had experienced an adverse event within 1 month. For the ROSE, SFSR, FAINT, CSRS and BSC tools, sensitivities were 81.3%, 76.3%, 93.2%, 71.2%, and 94.9%, specificities were 88.3%, 87.7%, 56.8%, 71.6%, and 67.3%, and NPVs were 92.9%, 91.0%, 95.8%, 87.2%, and 97.3%, respectively.

conclusionThe five assessed tools could be useful for physicians in screening older patients with syncope for the risk of short-term adverse events, according to the patient's actual situation.

Indexed as

SyncopeAgedBostonCanadaHumansMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk Assessmentolder adultpatient outcome assessmentprediction toolretrospective studyrisk stratificationSyncope

Identifiers

PMID38190847
PMCPMC10775749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.