Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38190813›Full record

ArticleFetal diagnosis and therapy2024

Fetal Spina Bifida Repair in Obese Mothers: Is Maternal and Fetal Safety Compromised?

Julia Zepf, Ladina Vonzun, Ladina Rüegg, Nele Strübing, Franziska Krähenmann, Martin Meuli, Luca Mazzone, Ueli Moehrlen, Nicole Ochsenbein-Kölble, Spina Bifida Study Group Zurich

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Fetal diagnosis and therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Benefits and complications of fetal and postnatal surgery for open spina bifida: systematic review and proportional meta-analysis.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Julia ZepfDepartment of Obstetrics, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Ladina VonzunDepartment of Obstetrics, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Ladina RüeggDepartment of Obstetrics, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Nele StrübingDepartment of Obstetrics, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Franziska KrähenmannDepartment of Obstetrics, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Martin MeuliUniversity of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Luca MazzoneThe Zurich Center for Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Ueli MoehrlenThe Zurich Center for Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Nicole Ochsenbein-KölbleDepartment of Obstetrics, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Spina Bifida Study Group Zurich
University Hospital of Zurich · CHUniversity of Zurich · CHUniversity Children's Hospital Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe Management of Myelomeningocele Study (MOMS) eligibility criteria preclude in utero surgery for fetal spina bifida (fSB) when the maternal body mass index (BMI) is ≥35 kg/m2. Some centers still respect this criterion, while others, like ours, do not. This study aimed to assess whether maternal and fetal safety is compromised with higher maternal BMIs.

methodsData of 192 patients with open fSB repair at our center were retrospectively analyzed. According to their BMI, patients were divided into three groups: group 1 (BMI <30 kg/m2), group 2 (BMI 30-35 kg/m2), and group 3 (BMI >35 kg/m2). Subgroup analysis was performed to assess differences in maternal and fetal outcomes. Additionally, complications were divided into grades 1 to 5 according to their severity and outcome consequences and compared among groups.

resultsOut of 192 patients, 146 (76.0%) had a BMI <30 kg/m2, 28 (14.6%) had a BMI 30-35 kg/m2, and 18 (9.4%) had a BMI >35 kg/m2. Significant differences occurring more often in either group 2 or 3 compared to group 1 were maternal wound seroma (50% or 56% vs. 32%, p = 0.04), amniotic fluid leakage (14% or 6% vs. 2%, p = 0.01) as well as vaginal bleeding (11% or 35% vs. 9%, p = 0.01). On the contrary, duration of tocolysis with atosiban was shorter in patients with BMI >30 kg/m2 (4 or 5 vs. 6 days, p = 0.01). When comparing severity of maternal or fetal complications, grade 1 intervention-related complications occurred significantly more often in group 3 compared to group 1 or 2 (78% vs. 45% or 57%, p = 0.02). Gestational age at delivery was around 36 weeks in all groups without significant differences.

conclusionThis investigation did not identify clinically relevant maternal and/or fetal outcome problems related to BMIs >35 kg/m2. Additional studies are however needed to confirm our results.

Indexed as

MeningomyeloceleSpina Bifida CysticaSpinal DysraphismFemaleFetusHumansInfantObesityPregnancyRetrospective StudiesFetal spina bifidaFetal surgeryMyelomeningocele repairObesitySafetySurgical complications

Identifiers

PMID38190813
PMCPMC10994580
OpenAlexW4390658641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.