ArticlePloS one2024
Crop DNA extraction with lab-made magnetic nanoparticles.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Automation of N-glycan purification using amine-functionalized NiFeScientific reports · 2026Article
- LeechWorld journal of gastroenterology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Molecular breeding methods, such as marker-assisted selection and genomic selection, require high-throughput and cost-effective methods for isolating genomic DNA from plants, specifically from crop tissue or seed with high polysaccharides, lipids, and proteins. A quick and inexpensive high-throughput method for isolating genomic DNA from seed and leaf tissue from multiple crops was tested with a DNA isolation method that combines CTAB extraction buffer and lab-made SA-coated magnetic nanoparticles. This method is capable of isolating quality genomic DNA from leaf tissue and seeds in less than 2 hours with fewer steps than a standard CTAB extraction method. The yield of the genomic DNA was 582-729 ng per 5 leaf discs or 216-1869 ng per seed in soybean, 2.92-62.6 ng per 5 leaf discs or 78.9-219 ng per seed in wheat, and 30.9-35.4 ng per 5 leaf discs in maize. The isolated DNA was tested with multiple molecular breeding methods and was found to be of sufficient quality and quantity for PCR and targeted genotyping by sequencing methods such as molecular inversion probes (MIPs). The combination of SA-coated magnetic nanoparticles and CTAB extraction buffer is a fast, simple, and environmentally friendly, high-throughput method for both leaf tissues and seed(s) DNA preparation at low cost per sample. The DNA obtained from this method can be deployed in applied breeding programs for marker-assisted selection or genomic selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.