Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38190379›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2024

Associations between gestational weight gain under different guidelines and adverse birth outcomes: A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial in rural western China.

Yingze Zhu, Liang Wang, Qi Qi, Yue Cheng, Zhonghai Zhu, Lingxia Zeng

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 100% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yingze ZhuDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi'an, Shaanxi, P.R. China.
Liang WangDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi'an, Shaanxi, P.R. China.
Qi QiDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi'an, Shaanxi, P.R. China.
Yue ChengDepartment of Nutrition and Food Safety Research, School of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi'an, Shaanxi, P.R. China.
Zhonghai ZhuDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi'an, Shaanxi, P.R. China.
Lingxia ZengDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi'an, Shaanxi, P.R. China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4649-9818
Xi'an Jiaotong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several gestational weight gain (GWG) guidelines have been established based on monocenter or multicenter researches. We aimed to examine the associations between categories of GWG under the Institute of Medicine (IOM) recommendation guideline, the Chinese National Health Commission (NHC) guideline, and weight-gain-for-gestational-age z-scores derived from the INTERGROWTH-21st Project and adverse birth outcomes. We used data from an antenatal micronutrient supplementation trial in rural western China between 2002 and 2006. Maternal weekly average GWG during the second and third trimesters was calculated and classified into inadequate, adequate and excessive GWG according to the IOM and NHC, respectively. Weight-gain-for-gestational-age z-scores derived from the INTERGROWTH-21st Project were grouped into three subgroups using two approaches: z-score percentile<25th, 25th to 75th, >75th and z-score <-1, -1 to 1, >1 SD. Infant birth weight and gestational age were measured using standard approaches. Generalized linear model with binomial family and logit link was applied to estimate the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidential intervals (CI) for GWG categories and adverse birth outcomes. Among 1,239 women with normal weight (18.5 kg/m2 to 23.9 kg/m2) during early pregnancy, 18.0% and 34.2% were classified as adequate GWG according to IOM and NHC, respectively. Less than half of Chinese women reached optimal GWG by any recommendation guideline. According to NHC, excessive GWG showed a significant association with macrosomia (OR 3.75, 95% CI 1.03, 13.74), large-for-gestation-age (LGA) (OR 2.12, 95% CI 1.01, 4.45), and inadequate GWG was associated with post-term birth (OR 2.25, 95% CI 1.21, 4.16), compared with adequate GWG. Inappropriate GWG was associated with adverse birth outcomes even among women with normal weight during early pregnancy. The monitoring and interventions of weight status during pregnancy, especially for the second and third trimesters, are of great public health importance for optimal birth outcomes. Additionally, developing guideline of appropriate GWG ranges should account for the traits of regional population.

Identifiers

PMID38190379
PMCPMC10773947
OpenAlexW4390675068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.