ArticlePLOS global public health2024
Using e-modules for acquisition of complex diabetes skills in diabetes care providers in Rwanda.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) is life-threatening without appropriate treatment. Though pediatric endocrinology care is limited in Rwanda, a decentralized health system allows access to local non-communicable disease (NCD) nurses through a network of 42 district hospitals. Recent rapid expansion of internet access in the country makes virtual diabetes education initiatives possible. We investigated whether Rwandan NCD nurses receiving diabetes education via online e-modules could make similar educational gains in insulin adjustment skills (IAS) compared to NCD nurses educated in a conference-style setting, and whether they would maintain equivalent competency at 1 year after education. We randomized 21 district hospitals and their NCD nurses to participate in a 1.5-day educational conference centered around care of type 1 diabetes (Group 1), while nurses from the remaining 21 hospitals (Group 2) received accommodation and access to equivalent educational materials in e-module form. Both groups were requested to review initial course materials at 4, 8, and 12 months. Ten-point IAS assessments were administered before and after education or review at each time point. Groups 1 and 2 had equal improvement after education (+2.0 vs. +2.0, p = 0.47) and equal final score at baseline (6.0 vs. 6.0, p = 0.74). However, both groups showed a diminishing improvement over time, so that any gains were lost by 4 months in Group 1 and 8 months in Group 2. Group 1 showed greater attrition in participation over time (19% vs 58% continued participation at one year, p = 0.002). Groups did not differ in subjective confidence in IAS after education. Both groups identified existing or potential access barriers to their respective educational method. While further modifications should be trialed to ensure equitable access and to maintain long-term engagement, online education is a feasible method to teach complex subspecialty skills to providers working in low-resource settings.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.