Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38190236›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2024

Determining Distinct Suicide Attempts From Recurrent Electronic Health Record Codes: Classification Study.

Kate H Bentley, Emily M Madsen, Eugene Song, Yu Zhou, Victor Castro, Hyunjoon Lee, Younga H Lee, Jordan W Smoller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Big data research: the importance of the data-generating process and domain expertise.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Comparing patient-reported symptoms and structured clinician documentation in electronic health records.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kate H Bentley *Center for Precision Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6875-6440
Emily M Madsen *Center for Precision Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4632-3027
Eugene SongCenter for Precision Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8785-7562
Yu ZhouCenter for Precision Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-6547-4413
Victor CastroMass General Brigham Research Information Science and Computing, Somerville, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7390-6354
Hyunjoon LeeCenter for Precision Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4694-7016
Younga H LeeDepartment of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7517-6594
Jordan W SmollerCenter for Precision Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0381-6334

Funding

Project-001P50MH129699 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI JORDAN W SMOLLER · 2023 to 2026
$16.6M
Improved multifactorial prediction of suicidal behavior through integration of multiple datasetsR01MH117599 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI REIS, BEN Y, SMOLLER, JORDAN W · 2018 to 2021
$2.1M
Digital Monitoring of Agitation for Short-Term Suicide Risk PredictionK23MH120436 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI BENTLEY, KATE H. · 2019 to 2024
$1.0M
NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH120436NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH129699NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH117599
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrior suicide attempts are a relatively strong risk factor for future suicide attempts. There is growing interest in using longitudinal electronic health record (EHR) data to derive statistical risk prediction models for future suicide attempts and other suicidal behavior outcomes. However, model performance may be inflated by a largely unrecognized form of "data leakage" during model training: diagnostic codes for suicide attempt outcomes may refer to prior attempts that are also included in the model as predictors.

objectiveWe aimed to develop an automated rule for determining when documented suicide attempt diagnostic codes identify distinct suicide attempt events.

methodsFrom a large health care system's EHR, we randomly sampled suicide attempt codes for 300 patients with at least one pair of suicide attempt codes documented at least one but no more than 90 days apart. Supervised chart reviewers assigned the clinical settings (ie, emergency department [ED] versus non-ED), methods of suicide attempt, and intercode interval (number of days). The probability (or positive predictive value) that the second suicide attempt code in a given pair of codes referred to a distinct suicide attempt event from its preceding suicide attempt code was calculated by clinical setting, method, and intercode interval.

resultsOf 1015 code pairs reviewed, 835 (82.3%) were nonindependent (ie, the 2 codes referred to the same suicide attempt event). When the second code in a pair was documented in a clinical setting other than the ED, it represented a distinct suicide attempt 3.3% of the time. The more time elapsed between codes, the more likely the second code in a pair referred to a distinct suicide attempt event from its preceding code. Code pairs in which the second suicide attempt code was assigned in an ED at least 5 days after its preceding suicide attempt code had a positive predictive value of 0.90.

conclusionsEHR-based suicide risk prediction models that include International Classification of Diseases codes for prior suicide attempts as a predictor may be highly susceptible to bias due to data leakage in model training. We derived a simple rule to distinguish codes that reflect new, independent suicide attempts: suicide attempt codes documented in an ED setting at least 5 days after a preceding suicide attempt code can be confidently treated as new events in EHR-based suicide risk prediction models. This rule has the potential to minimize upward bias in model performance when prior suicide attempts are included as predictors in EHR-based suicide risk prediction models.

Indexed as

automated ruleEHRelectronic health recordinformaticsmachine learningmodelpredictpredictionpredictive modelpsychiatryself-injurysuicidalsuicidesuicide attempt

Identifiers

PMID38190236
PMCPMC10804255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.