Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38190192›Full record

ReviewIISE transactions on occupational ergonomics and human factors

A Literature Review on Safety Perception and Trust during Human-Robot Interaction with Autonomous Mobile Robots That Apply to Industrial Environments.

Justin M Haney, Ci-Jyun Liang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in IISE transactions on occupational ergonomics and human factors. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. The human-robot interaction scale database.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Industrial Robotics and the Future of Work.American journal of industrial medicine · 2025
    Review
  8. Active interaction strategy generation for human-robot collaboration based on trust.Visual computing for industry, biomedicine, and art · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Justin M HaneyDivision of Safety Research, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Morgantown, WV, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8841-6670
Ci-Jyun LiangDivision of Safety Research, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Morgantown, WV, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0213-8471

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Occupational ApplicationsAutonomous mobile robots are used in manufacturing and warehousing industries, to transport material across the facility and deliver parts to work cells. Human workers might encounter or interact with these robots in aisle ways or at their workstation. It is important to consider factors that impact worker safety and trust when implementing autonomous mobile robots in the workplace. This paper reviews prior research that aims to improve the safety of human-robot interaction with autonomous mobile robots and identifies needs for future research. Researchers used a variety of questionnaires and behavioral assessment methods to measure perceived safety. Factors such as robot appearance, approach speed, and approach direction, significantly affect perceived safety. Additionally, projection of signals on the floor, turn signals, and haptic communication devices, can improve the predictability and overall safety of robot navigation.

Indexed as

RoboticsTrustHumansMan-Machine SystemsPerceptionSafetyautonomous mobile robotHuman–robot interactionsafetytrust

Identifiers

PMID38190192
PMCPMC11076167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.