Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38190145›Full record

ArticleJournal of vision2024

Interaction between central and peripheral vision: Influence of distance and spatial frequencies.

Cynthia Faurite, Eva Aprile, Louise Kauffmann, Martial Mermillod, Mathilde Gallice, Christophe Chiquet, Benoit R Cottereau, Carole Peyrin

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vision, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07727369 (RePer-AGE), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07727369 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

RePer-AGE: Reorganization of Visuo-cognitive Functions Based on Peripheral Vision With Aging

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, GrenobleRan2026 to 2030Enrolled160ConditionsAging, Visual Perception, CognitionArmsPsychophysical visual recognition tasks, Ophthalmological assessment, Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Cynthia FauriteUniversité Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, Grenoble, France.
Eva AprileUniversité Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, Grenoble, France.
Louise KauffmannUniversité Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, Grenoble, France.
Martial MermillodUniversité Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, Grenoble, France.
Mathilde GalliceDepartment of Ophthalmology, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France.
Christophe ChiquetDepartment of Ophthalmology, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France.
Benoit R CottereauCentre de Recherche Cerveau et Cognition, Université Toulouse III-Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France.
Carole PeyrinUniversité Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, Grenoble, France.
Université Savoie Mont Blanc · FRUniversité Grenoble Alpes · FRUniversité Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visual scene perception is based on reciprocal interactions between central and peripheral information. Such interactions are commonly investigated through the semantic congruence effect, which usually reveals a congruence effect of central vision on peripheral vision as strong as the reverse. The aim of the present study was to further investigate the mechanisms underlying central-peripheral visual interactions using a central-peripheral congruence paradigm through three behavioral experiments. We presented simultaneously a central and a peripheral stimulus, that could be either semantically congruent or incongruent. To assess the congruence effect of central vision on peripheral vision, participants had to categorize the peripheral target stimulus while ignoring the central distractor stimulus. To assess the congruence effect of the peripheral vision on central vision, they had to categorize the central target stimulus while ignoring the peripheral distractor stimulus. Experiment 1 revealed that the physical distance between central and peripheral stimuli influences central-peripheral visual interactions: Congruence effect of central vision is stronger when the distance between the target and the distractor is the shortest. Experiments 2 and 3 revealed that the spatial frequency content of distractors also influence central-peripheral interactions: Congruence effect of central vision is observed only when the distractor contained high spatial frequencies while congruence effect of peripheral vision is observed only when the distractor contained low spatial frequencies. These results raise the question of how these influences are exerted (bottom-up vs. top-down) and are discussed based on the retinocortical properties of the visual system and the predictive brain hypothesis.

Indexed as

BrainVisual PerceptionHumansSemantics

Identifiers

PMID38190145
PMCPMC10777871
OpenAlexW4390674405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.