ArticleJAMA neurology2024
Argatroban in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke With Early Neurological Deterioration: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Article in JAMA neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04275180 (Efficacy of Argatroban in Acute Ischemic Stroke With Early Neurological Deterioration), which is not on this map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Efficacy of Argatroban in Acute Ischemic Stroke With Early Neurological Deterioration
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploring the Efficacy and Safety of Argatroban as an Adjunct to Antiplatelet Therapy in Ischemic Stroke Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Translational stroke research · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of Argatroban in patients with acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Pooled it
- Effects of PCSK9 inhibitor evolocumab on preventing early neurological deterioration in acute ischemic stroke patients with or without large artery atherosclerosis: a subgroup analysis of a randomized trial.BMC neurology · 2025 · on this mapTrial
- Baseline systolic blood pressure and efficacy of dual antiplatelet in acute ischaemic stroke.Stroke and vascular neurology · 2025Trial
- Argatroban plus alteplase in posterior versus anterior circulation stroke.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2025Trial
- Adjunctive Intravenous Argatroban or Eptifibatide for Ischemic Stroke.The New England journal of medicine · 2024Trial
- Tirofiban with sequential dual antiplatelet therapy in mild acute ischemic stroke (TiMIS): protocol for a multicenter, randomized controlled trial.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- Efficacy and safety of treatment strategies for early neurological deterioration after acute ischemic stroke: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC neurology · 2026Article
- Safety and effects of continuous argatroban administration in acute cerebral infarction: a retrospective analysis.Journal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences · 2026Article
- Fibrinogenase and Direct Thrombin Inhibitor for Injection in the Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Optimizing Early Antithrombotic Therapy Within 24 Hours of Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke.CNS drugs · 2026Review
- Clinical application of the HALP score for predicting early neurological deterioration in older patients with acute cerebral infarction.Biomedical reports · 2026Article
- Clarifying Molecular Mechanisms and Novel Strategies for Intervention of Uremia and Cognitive Decline.Kidney & blood pressure research · 2026Review
- Efficacy and safety of Qingre Huatan Formula for the prevention of early neurological deterioration in patients with acute ischemic stroke (QUIET): rationale and design for a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Comparison of clinical efficacy between argatroban and tirofiban in patients with atherosclerotic cerebral infarction complicated by early neurological deterioration.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Mechanism-Oriented Treatment of Early Neurologic Deterioration in Acute Ischemic Stroke.Journal of stroke · 2026Review
- Drug Design for Cerebral Ischemia: A Molecular Perspective Review.CNS & neurological disorders drug targets · 2026Review
- Back Again to the Future: A New Era for Cerebroprotection.Annals of neurology · 2026Review
- Effect of in-hospital and post-discharge complications on 1-year functional outcome after stroke and transient ischemic attack.European stroke journal · 2026Article
- Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, and Medical Management of Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease.Journal of neuroendovascular therapy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
41 authors at 20 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: The effect of argatroban in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and early neurological deterioration (END) is unknown. Objective: To assess the efficacy of argatroban for END in AIS. Design, Setting, and Participants: This open-label, blinded-end point, randomized clinical trial was conducted from April 4, 2020, through July 31, 2022. The date of final follow-up was October 31, 2022. This was a multicenter trial. Eligible patients were adults with AIS who experienced END, which was defined as an increase of 2 or more points on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale within 48 hours from symptom onset. Patients who withdrew consent, experienced duplicate randomization, or were lost to follow-up were excluded from the study. Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned to the argatroban group and control group within 48 hours of symptom onset. Both groups received standard therapy based on guidelines, including oral mono or dual antiplatelet therapy. The argatroban group received intravenous argatroban for 7 days (continuous infusion at a dose of 60 mg per day for 2 days, followed by 20 mg per day for 5 days) in addition to standard therapy. Main Outcome and Measure: The primary end point was good functional outcome at 90 days, defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 3. Results: A total of 628 patients (mean [SD] age, 65 [11.9] years; 400 male [63.7%]) were included in this study (argatroban group, 314 [50%] and control group, 314 [50%]). Of these, 18 withdrew consent, 1 had duplicate randomization, and 8 were lost to follow-up. A total of 601 patients with stroke were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Finally, 564 patients were included in the per-protocol analysis as 6 participants in the argatroban group and 31 participants in the control group did not follow the complete protocol. The number of patients with good functional outcome at 90 days was 240 (80.5%) in the argatroban group and 222 (73.3%) in the control group (risk difference, 7.2%; 95% CI, 0.6%-14.0%; risk ratio, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.01-1.20; P = .04). The proportion of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was 3 of 317 (0.9%) in the argatroban group and 2 of 272 (0.7%) in the control group (P = .78). Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with AIS with END, treatment with argatroban and antiplatelet therapy resulted in a better functional outcome at 90 days. This trial provided evidence to support the use of argatroban in reducing disability for patients with END. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04275180.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.