Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38190081›Full record

ArticleGeroScience2024

Factors influencing gait performance in older adults in a dual-task paradigm.

Karina Elizabeth Andrade Lara, José Carlos Cabrera Linares, Juan Antonio Párraga Montilla, Pedro Ángel Latorre Román

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GeroScience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Karina Elizabeth Andrade LaraDepartment of Musical, Plastic and Corporal Expression, University of Jaén, Paraje Las Lagunillas, S/N.,, 23071, Jaén, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9804-1318
José Carlos Cabrera LinaresDepartment of Musical, Plastic and Corporal Expression, University of Jaén, Paraje Las Lagunillas, S/N.,, 23071, Jaén, Spain. jccabrer@ujaen.es.ORCID 0000-0002-1059-5154
Juan Antonio Párraga MontillaDepartment of Musical, Plastic and Corporal Expression, University of Jaén, Paraje Las Lagunillas, S/N.,, 23071, Jaén, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0250-0717
Pedro Ángel Latorre RománDepartment of Musical, Plastic and Corporal Expression, University of Jaén, Paraje Las Lagunillas, S/N.,, 23071, Jaén, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0517-3627
Universidad de Jaén · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the effect of cognitive interference through a dual-task (DT) paradigm on gait parameters by sex or other predictive variables, such as physical fitness, health status, and cognition. A total of 125 older adults joined in this study (age, 72.42 ± 5.56 years old; 28 men and 97 women). The DT paradigm was evaluated through Comfortable Linear Gait (CLG) and Complex Gait Test (CGT). The gait parameters between single task (ST) vs. DT condition in men showed a significant reduction in speed (p < 0.001), cadence (p < 0.001), and step length (p = 0.049) and increased time to execute the CGT (p < 0.001), while women showed a decreased speed (p = 0.014), cadence (p < 0.001), and double support coefficient variation (CV) (p = 0.024) and increased single support time (p < 0.001) and CV step length (p < 0.05). In addition, women increased CGT time (p < 0.001). Furthermore, correlations between DT cost (DTC) cadence vs. Physical Activity for Elderly questionnaire (PASE) (r =  - 0.399; p = 0.008), DTC single support vs. 30 s Sit to Stand Test (r = - 0.356; 0.016), DTC single support vs. Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test-Learning curve (r =  - 0.335; p = 0.023), DTC double support vs. 30 s Sit to Stand Test (r =  - 0.590; p < 0.001), DTC CV step length vs. 30 s Sit to Stand (r =  - 0.545; p = 0.003), and DTC CGT vs. 30 s Sit to Stand Test (r =  - 0.377; p = 0.048) were found. The results of our study indicate that the gait parameters within the DT condition decreased speed and cadence, while increasing CV step length and CGT time, causing slower gait with shortened steps in men and women.

Indexed as

GaitWalkingAgedCognitionExerciseExercise TestFemaleHumansMaleCognitionDual-taskGaitGait variabilityInterference

Identifiers

PMID38190081
PMCPMC11009214
OpenAlexW4390667382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.