Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38190034›Full record

ArticleClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2024

The predictive value of systemic immune-inflammatory markers before and after treatment for pathological complete response in patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer: a retrospective study of 1994 patients.

Huibo Wang, Zhenfeng Huang, Bingqi Xu, Jinxing Zhang, Pengfei He, Fei Gao, Ruifeng Zhang, Xiatian Huang, Ming Shan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Huibo Wang *Department of Breast Surgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin Medical University, 150 Haping Road, Nangang District, Harbin, 150081, Heilongjiang, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5039-7224
Zhenfeng Huang *Department of Breast Surgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin Medical University, 150 Haping Road, Nangang District, Harbin, 150081, Heilongjiang, China.
Bingqi XuDepartment of Breast Surgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin Medical University, 150 Haping Road, Nangang District, Harbin, 150081, Heilongjiang, China.
Jinxing ZhangDepartment of Breast Surgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin Medical University, 150 Haping Road, Nangang District, Harbin, 150081, Heilongjiang, China.
Pengfei HeDepartment of Breast Surgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin Medical University, 150 Haping Road, Nangang District, Harbin, 150081, Heilongjiang, China.
Fei GaoDepartment of Breast Surgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin Medical University, 150 Haping Road, Nangang District, Harbin, 150081, Heilongjiang, China.
Ruifeng ZhangDepartment of Breast Surgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin Medical University, 150 Haping Road, Nangang District, Harbin, 150081, Heilongjiang, China.
Xiatian HuangDepartment of Breast Surgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin Medical University, 150 Haping Road, Nangang District, Harbin, 150081, Heilongjiang, China.
Ming ShanDepartment of Breast Surgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin Medical University, 150 Haping Road, Nangang District, Harbin, 150081, Heilongjiang, China. shanming8145@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9495-1645
Harbin Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSystemic immune-inflammatory markers have a certain predictive role in pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) in breast cancer. However, there is a lack of research exploring the predictive value of markers after treatment.

methodsThis retrospective study collected data from 1994 breast cancer patients who underwent NAT. Relevant clinical and pathological characteristics were included, and pre- and post-treatment complete blood cell counts were evaluated to calculate four systemic immune-inflammatory markers: neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII). The optimal cutoff values for these markers were determined using ROC curves, and patients were classified into high-value and low-value groups based on these cutoff values. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to analyze factors influencing pCR. The factors with independent predictive value were used to construct a nomogram.

resultsAfter NAT, 383 (19.2%) patients achieved pCR. The area under the ROC curve is generally larger for post-treatment markers compared to pre-treatment markers. Pre-treatment NLR and PLR, as well as post-treatment LMR and SII, were identified as independent predictive factors for pCR, along with Ki-67, clinical tumor stage, clinical lymph node stage, molecular subtype, and clinical response. Higher pre-NLR (OR = 1.320; 95% CI 1.016-1.716; P = 0.038), pre-PLR (OR = 1.474; 95% CI 1.058-2.052; P = 0.022), post-LMR (OR = 1.532; 95% CI 1.175-1.996; P = 0.002), and lower post-SII (OR = 0.596; 95% CI 0.429-0.827; P = 0.002) are associated with a higher likelihood of achieving pCR. The established nomogram had a good predictive performance with an area under the ROC curve of 0.754 (95% CI 0.674-0.835).

conclusionBoth pre- and post-treatment systemic immune-inflammatory markers have a significant predictive role in achieving pCR after NAT in breast cancer patients. Indeed, it is possible that post-treatment markers have stronger predictive ability compared to pre-treatment markers.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsNeoadjuvant TherapyNeutrophilsAdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorBlood PlateletsFemaleHumansInflammationLymphocytesMiddle AgedMonocytesNomogramsPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorBreast cancerNeoadjuvant chemotherapyPathological complete responsePrognostic factorSystemic immune-inflammatory markers

Identifiers

PMID38190034
OpenAlexW4390673553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.