Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38189981›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2024

Normal cohorts in automated brain atrophy estimation: how many healthy subjects to include?

Christian Rubbert, Luisa Wolf, Marius Vach, Vivien L Ivan, Dennis M Hedderich, Christian Gaser, Robert Dahnke, Julian Caspers, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 100% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Christian RubbertDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany. christian.rubbert@med.uni-duesseldorf.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9461-1173
Luisa WolfDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Marius VachDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Vivien L IvanDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Dennis M HedderichDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, D-81675, Munich, Germany.
Christian GaserDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Jena University Hospital, D-07745, Jena, Germany.
Robert DahnkeDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Jena University Hospital, D-07745, Jena, Germany.
Julian CaspersDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative
Düsseldorf University Hospital · DEAarhus University · DKJena University Hospital · DETechnical University of Munich · DE

Funding

Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative - SupplementU01AG024904 · NIA · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE RES &EDUC · PI WEINER, MICHAEL W · 2004 to 2015
$121.0M
WU INSTITUTE OF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCESUL1TR002345 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI William G. Powderly · 2017 to 2026
$97.8M
Smartphone-Based "Burst" Cognitive AssessmentsP01AG003991 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Tammie Lee Smith Benzinger · 1985 to 2026
$69.5M
The natural history of AB accumulation in preclinical ADP01AG026276 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI SCHINDLER, SUZANNE ELIZABETH · 2005 to 2025
$49.5M
Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational SciencesUL1TR000448 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EVANOFF, BRADLEY A · 2012 to 2016
$41.4M
MAPPING THE HUMAN CONNECTOME DURING TYPICAL AGINGU01AG052564 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI SALAT, DAVID H, TERPSTRA, MELISSA J · 2016 to 2020
$18.9M
THE XNAT IMAGING INFORMATICS PLATFORMR01EB009352 · NIBIB · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Daniel Scott Marcus · 2009 to 2026
$9.3M
DRIVING PERFORMANCE IN PRECLINICAL ALZHEIMER'S DISEASER01AG043434 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI ROE, CATHERINE M · 2012 to 2016
$2.4M
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DA 2167/1-1NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000448NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002345NIA NIH HHS P01 AG003991NIA NIH HHS P01 AG026276NIA NIH HHS R01 AG043434NIA NIH HHS U01 AG024904NIA NIH HHS U01 AG052564NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB009352
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study investigates the influence of normal cohort (NC) size and the impact of different NCs on automated MRI-based brain atrophy estimation.

methodsA pooled NC of 3945 subjects (NC

resultsThe maximum knee point was at 15 subjects. For 21 AD/21 HC, a sufficient number of subjects were available in each NC for validation. Readers agreed on the AD diagnosis in all cases (Kappa for the extent of atrophy, 0.98). No differences in diagnoses between NCs were observed (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.91; Cochran's Q, p = 0.19).

conclusionAt least 15 subjects should be included in age- and sex-specific normal templates for consistent brain atrophy estimation. In the study's context, qualitative interpretation of regional atrophy allows reliable AD diagnosis with a high inter-reader agreement, irrespective of the NC used. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The influence of normal cohorts (NCs) on automated brain atrophy estimation, typically comparing individual scans to NCs, remains largely unexplored. Our study establishes the minimum number of NC-subjects needed and demonstrates minimal impact of different NCs on regional atrophy estimation. KEY POINTS: • Software-based brain atrophy estimation often relies on normal cohorts for comparisons. • At least 15 subjects must be included in an age- and sex-specific normal cohort. • Using different normal cohorts does not influence regional atrophy estimation.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseAtrophyBrainMagnetic Resonance ImagingAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleGray MatterHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleMiddle AgedReference ValuesReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesAtrophyBrainImage processing (computer-assisted)Magnetic resonance imagingNeurodegenerative diseases

Identifiers

PMID38189981
PMCPMC11255074
OpenAlexW4390669964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.