Trial reportClinical oral investigations2024
Effect of two irrigating solutions on antimicrobial activity and clinical and radiographic success after endodontic treatment in primary teeth: a randomized clinical trial.
Trial report in Clinical oral investigations, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Efficacy of Sodium Hypochlorite, Ozone, Diode Laser, and Photodynamic Therapy Against Enterococcus faecalis and Streptococcus mutans: An In-Vitro Study.Oral health & preventive dentistry · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThis study evaluated the antimicrobial activity, clinical and radiographic outcome of pulpectomy in primary teeth using either 1% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) or 2% chlorhexidine (CHX) as irrigants. MATERIALS AND
methodsA randomized double-blind controlled clinical study in which primary teeth were allocated to 1% NaOCl (n = 20) and 2% CHX (n = 20) groups. Microbiological collections were performed before and after irrigation for agar culture and real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). Clinical and radiographic success was assessed at different times. Data were submitted to descriptive analysis, chi-square, Mann-Whitney, and Wilcoxon tests (p < .05).
resultsFor 1% NaOCl, the following clinical and radiographic success rates were observed: 7 days (93%/80%); 30 days, 3 and 6 months (100%). For 2% CHX: 7 days (73%/53%); 30 days (93%); 3 months (100%/93%); 6 months (100%) (p > .05). One percent NaOCl and 2% CHX effectively reduced total microorganisms (p < .05) but not mutans streptococci (p > .05). In qPCR analysis, the solutions promoted a reduction of total bacteria and Streptococcus mutans, and no difference was observed between times and groups (p > .05).
conclusionsOne percent NaOCl and 2% CHX were effective for clinical and radiographic success and antimicrobial activity in primary teeth submitted to pulpectomy. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Studying the antimicrobial activity and clinical and radiographic outcomes of pulpectomy in primary teeth using NaOCl and CHX as irrigants is clinically relevant because it provides information for optimizing treatment protocols and improving the quality of care for pediatric patients. It contributes to evidence-based practice and can potentially lead to better outcomes, reduced complications, and enhanced patient experiences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.