Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38189973›Full record

Trial reportGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2024

Manhattan Vision Screening and Follow-Up Study (NYC-SIGHT): optometric exam improves access and utilization of eye care services.

Daniel F Diamond, Sitara Hirji, Samantha X Xing, Prakash Gorroochurn, Jason D Horowitz, Qing Wang, Lisa Park, Noga Harizman, Stefania C Maruri, Desiree R Henriquez and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04271709 (The Manhattan Vision Screening and Follow-Up Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04271709 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

The Manhattan Vision Screening and Follow-Up Study (NYC-SIGHT)

TypeinterventionalSponsorColumbia UniversityRan2019 to 2026Enrolled749ConditionsGlaucoma, Vision Impairment and Blindness, Cataract, Diabetic RetinopathyArmsEnhanced Intervention Using Patient Navigators, Usual Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel F DiamondDepartment of Ophthalmology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA.
Sitara HirjiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA.
Samantha X XingColumbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA.
Prakash GorroochurnDepartment of Biostatistics, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA.
Jason D HorowitzDepartment of Ophthalmology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA.
Qing WangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA.
Lisa ParkDepartment of Ophthalmology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA.
Noga HarizmanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA.
Stefania C MaruriEdward S. Harkness Eye Institute, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Desiree R HenriquezEdward S. Harkness Eye Institute, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Jeffrey M LiebmannDepartment of Ophthalmology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA.
George A CioffiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA.
Lisa A HarkDepartment of Ophthalmology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA. lah112@cumc.columbia.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5011-5610
Columbia University · USColumbia University Irving Medical Center · US

Funding

Manhattan Vision Screening and Follow-Up Study in Vulnerable PopulationsU01DP006436 · DP · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI HARK, LISA A. · 2019 to 2023
$3.5M
Coordinating Center for Community-Based Interventions with Vulnerable PopulationsU01DP006435 · DP · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI HARK, LISA A., PRICE, SIMANI · 2019 to 2023
$1.2M
NCCDPHP CDC HHS U01 DP006435NCCDPHP CDC HHS U01DP006435NCCDPHP CDC HHS U01 DP006436NCCDPHP CDC HHS U01DP006436NCCDPHP CDC HHS U01 DP006892
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo describe the benefits of optometric evaluation for detection of vision-affecting conditions in the context of community-based eye health screenings and identify factors associated with having a recent dilated eye exam.

methodsEnrolled participants were age 40 and older, living independently in affordable housing developments in New York City. Eye health screening failure and criteria for seeing the on-site study optometrist were defined as visual acuity 20/40 or worse in either eye, intraocular pressure 23-29 mmHg, or an unreadable fundus image. The optometrist conducted a manifest refraction using loose lenses and used a portable slit lamp and ophthalmoscope to perform a non-dilated anterior and posterior segment ocular health evaluation. Demographics, social determinants of health, eye health screening results, and rates of suspected ophthalmic conditions were recorded. To determine factors associated with having a recent dilated eye exam, which was the main outcome for this statistical analysis, a stepwise multivariate logistic regression was performed.

resultsA total of 708 participants were screened, 308 attended the optometric exam; mean age 70.7 ± 11.7 [standard deviation (SD)] years. Among this subgroup, 70.1% identified as female, 54.9% self-identified as African American, 39% as Hispanic/Latino, and 26.6% Dominican ethnicity; 78.2% (241/308) had not undergone a dilated eye exam within the last year, 71.4% reported they did not have an eye care provider. Stepwise multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that participants who self-reported having cataracts (odds ratio (OR) 2.15; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-4.47; p = 0.041), self-reported having glaucoma/glaucoma suspect (OR 5.60; 95% CI 2.02-15.43; p = 0.001), or spoke Spanish as their primary language (OR 3.25; 95% CI 1.48-7.11; p = 0.003) had higher odds of having a recent dilated eye exam.

conclusionsThis community-based screening initiative demonstrated the effectiveness of optometric exams in detecting vision-affecting conditions and identified factors associated with having a recent dilated eye exam. Optometrists play a vital role in increasing access to eye care for high-risk, underserved populations.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04271709).

Indexed as

CataractGlaucomaOcular HypertensionVision ScreeningAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMiddle AgedVision DisordersCommunity-basedEye health screeningHealth-care accessOptometric examOptometristRefractionVision impairment

Identifiers

PMID38189973
PMCPMC11748831
OpenAlexW4390669547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.