Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38189969›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2024

The significance of the presence of extranodal extension in the metastatic node of differentiated thyroid cancer: a proposal for modification in the American Thyroid Association (ATA) risk stratification.

Nithyanand Chidambaranathan, Shivakumar Thiagarajan, B Gurukeerthi, Pranav Sathe, Priyanka Samel, Natarajan Ramalingam, Devendra Chaukar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Nithyanand ChidambaranathanDepartment of Head and Neck Oncology, Kovai Medical Hospital, Coimbatore, India.
Shivakumar ThiagarajanDepartment of Head and Neck Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre and Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India. drshiva78in@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1957-3338
B GurukeerthiDepartment of Head and Neck Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre and Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India.
Pranav SatheDepartment of Head and Neck Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre and Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India.
Priyanka SamelDepartment of Head and Neck Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre and Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India.
Natarajan RamalingamDepartment of Head and Neck Oncology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.
Devendra ChaukarDepartment of Head and Neck Oncology, Max Nanavati Hospital, Mumbai, India.
Homi Bhabha National Institute · INChristian Medical College, Vellore · INDr. Balabhai Nanavati Hospital · INKovai Medical Center and Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMultiple factors contribute to recurrences in differentiated thyroid cancers (DTC). Though the nodal size and number of positive nodes along with the presence of extranodal extension (ENE) have been mentioned in the present ATA risk stratification, the weightage given for ENE seems inadequate compared to the former two. METHODOLOGY: Factors predicting recurrences were analysed in this retrospective study of patients with DTC operated in a tertiary care centre. Based on our findings, we propose a modification in the present risk stratification. We have done so by comparing with existing risk stratification for fit and discrimination of this system.

resultsOut of 1428 patients, 859 (60.2%) patients had pathological nodal metastases (pN +) with ENE being present in 26.8% of these. The recurrence rate was 6.4% (92 patients). Recurrence rates in patients with ≤ 5 nodes without ENE, > 5 nodes without ENE, ≤ 5 nodes with ENE and > 5 nodes with ENE were 2.7%, 1.3%, 8.3% and 10.3%, respectively. Recurrence rates in patients with 0.2-3 cm without ENE, 0.2-3 cm with ENE and > 3 cm with/without ENE were 1.8%, 8.5% and 13.4%, respectively. A modified risk stratification incorporating ENE and excluding the number of metastatic nodes was proposed. The modified risk stratification had a better fit than the present system in terms of higher C index and lower AIC.

conclusionsExtranodal extension in differentiated thyroid cancer had the maximum influence on recurrence risk (recurrence-free survival) in our cohort. The prognostic impact of ENE supersedes the number of positive nodes in the risk of recurrence.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaCarcinoma, PapillaryThyroid NeoplasmsExtranodal ExtensionHumansLymph NodesNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentThyroid Cancer, PapillaryUnited StatesDifferentiated thyroid cancerExtranodal extensionRecurrence

Identifiers

PMID38189969
PMCPMC13375667
OpenAlexW4390673721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.