Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38189966›Full record

Trial reportEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2024

The effectiveness of evidence-based nursing intervention for nasal irrigation after endoscopic sinus surgery in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis: a randomized controlled trial.

Lei Wang, Yaru Lv, Xiaowei Chang, Mengyao Wang, Juan Wang, Jianwen Yang, Chunming Zhang

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lei Wang *College of Nursing, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5048-1680
Yaru Lv *College of Nursing, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9992-6281
Xiaowei ChangPeking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2738-4185
Mengyao WangThe First Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Military Medical University, Xian, Shanxi, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0504-688X
Juan WangFenyang College of Shanxi Medical University, Lvliang, Shanxi, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9083-6693
Jianwen YangDepartment of Nursing, The Second Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9953-7788
Chunming ZhangDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, No. 56 Xinjian South Road, Taiyuan, 030001, Shanxi, China. zcm380@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-1991-3964
Shanxi Medical University · CNChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNSecond Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate its effect of an evidence-based nursing program for nasal irrigation after endoscopic sinus surgery in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS).

methodsA total of 66 patients with CRS were randomly divided into two groups, for which the experimental group received evidence-based nasal irrigation nursing, and the control group received conventional nursing. Differences in Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-20 (SNOT-20), visual analogue scale (VAS), Lund-Mackay CT, Endoscopic Lund Kennedy Score (LKES) and overall efficacy were assessed between the two groups.

results2, 4 and 12 weeks after the intervention, the scores of SNOT-20, VAS, Lund-Mackay CT and LKES in the two groups were significantly lower than those before the surgery (P < 0.05). Compared with the control group, the scores were significantly lower in the experimental group (P < 0.05). 12 weeks after the intervention, the overall effective rate of treatment in the experimental group was 90.62%, while the control group was 16.43%, but the difference was not statistically significant in treatment effect (P > 0.05).

conclusionsThe implementation of nasal irrigation evidence-based nursing program for patients with CRS after endoscopic sinus surgery can promote postoperative nasal mucosal recovery, improve treatment efficiency, and help improve patient comfort, quality of life and other subjective feelings.

trial registrationThe study was registered retrospectively with reference number ChiCTR2300075484 on 06/09/2023, available at: https://www.chictr.org.cn .

Indexed as

Nasal PolypsRhinitisRhinosinusitisSinusitisChronic DiseaseEndoscopyEvidence-Based NursingHumansNasal LavageQuality of LifeRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeChronic rhino sinusitisEvidence-based nursingInterventional researchNasal irrigation

Identifiers

PMID38189966
OpenAlexW4390668947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.